Thank you.  I will try and find more pictures.
Warm regards
Sanjeev

On Jun 29, 11:01 am, ajinkya gadave <[email protected]> wrote:
> i think this is Sterculia urens
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 5:45 PM, Mahadeswara <[email protected]> wrote:
> > This is not Cochlospermum religiosum.Leaves of Cochlospermum
> > religiosum are quite different (pentaphyllate).  Do you have any other
> > photographs of the  tree or bush to be ID-ied..
>
> > On Jun 29, 8:49 am, Sanjeev Kumar <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > Dear Friends,
> >https://picasaweb.google.com/ka.naturesociety/FloraOfMelagiri#5607398....
> > ..
> > > We have identified the tree in the above pictures as Cochlospermum
> > > religiosum.  However the other photographs I have seen on the net of this
> > > tree seem to have deeper lobes on the leaves.
> > > I will be grateful if anyone can confirm the id or help us id the tree.
>
> > > BTW, we are making a catalogue of trees in our area which can be found
> > here:https://picasaweb.google.com/ka.naturesociety/FloraOfMelagiri#
> > > WArm regards
> > > --
> > > Sanjeev Kumar S.R

Reply via email to