I agree that Spermacoce articularis is a wrong id. Thank you Muthuji for pointing out the mistake.
Regards, Giby On Jul 26, 1:36 pm, Muthu Karthick <[email protected]> wrote: > Dear all, > The posted picture looks more like *Richardia scabra* as per the > threadhttps://groups.google.com/group/indiantreepix/browse_thread/thread/7e... > > Refer earlier discussion on *Spermacoce articularis* > here:https://groups.google.com/group/indiantreepix/browse_thread/thread/14... > > On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 10:10 PM, Smilax004 <[email protected]>wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Please check Spermacoce articularis of Rubiaceae. > > > Regards > > Giby > > > On Jul 25, 9:24 pm, shivaprakash adavanne <[email protected]> wrote: > > > hello, > > > ALways confusing Rubiacea members are again requested for id. > > > > excuse me for posting two spp in frame. > > > > regards > > > a.shivaprakash > > > > Borreria stricts vs Richardia scabra (1).JPG > > > 33KViewDownload > > > > Borreria stricts vs Richardia scabra.JPG > > > 78KViewDownload > > -- > Muthu Karthick, N > Care Earth Trust > #15, second main road, > Thillai ganga nagar, > Chennai - 600 061 > Mob: 0091 96268 33911www.careearthtrust.org
