Dear Sirji, Sorry again, but i think its not a variation in the plant, both the species are quite different and they must be treated at the species level.
now its depend on group, whatever they follow??? regards, On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 7:32 PM, Gurcharan Singh <[email protected]> wrote: > Dear H S > The database of our group and Flowers of India website have practice to > follow established databases GRIN, The Plant List, Sorting Plant names. Some > of us may have preference for our regional Floras, but nomenclature in these > often gets outdated soon, and we have to follow the practice in recent > Floras and databases. > > > -- > Dr. Gurcharan Singh > Retired Associate Professor > SGTB Khalsa College, University of Delhi, Delhi-110007 > Res: 932 Anand Kunj, Vikas Puri, New Delhi-110018. > Phone: 011-25518297 Mob: 9810359089 > http://people.du.ac.in/~singhg45/ > > On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 7:26 PM, H S <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Sirji it depends that somebody treat it at species level and some at >> variety level.. >> >> i consider both as distinct species.. >> >> regards, >> >> >> On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 12:36 PM, Gurcharan Singh <[email protected]>wrote: >> >>> Madhuca indica Gmelin is now correctly known as *Madhuca longifolia >>> var. latifolia (Roxb.) A. Chev.*), identified by Neil ji >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Dr. Gurcharan Singh >>> Retired Associate Professor >>> SGTB Khalsa College, University of Delhi, Delhi-110007 >>> Res: 932 Anand Kunj, Vikas Puri, New Delhi-110018. >>> Phone: 011-25518297 Mob: 9810359089 >>> http://people.du.ac.in/~singhg45/ >>> >>> On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 11:27 AM, H S <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> I guess Madhuca indica Gmelin >>>> >>>> regards, >>>> >>>> On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 12:16 AM, Balkar Arya <[email protected]>wrote: >>>> >>>>> I think i should sleep now >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 12:11 AM, Balkar Arya <[email protected]>wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Oh Really a great mistake >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 12:05 AM, Neil Soares <[email protected] >>>>>> > wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi Dr. Balkar, >>>>>>> Nice photographs but they are of Mohua [Madhuca longifolia var. >>>>>>> latifolia]. >>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>> Neil Soares. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> --- On *Tue, 8/9/11, Balkar Arya <[email protected]>* wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> From: Balkar Arya <[email protected]> >>>>>>> Subject: [efloraofindia:76540] Flora of Haryana: Terminalia Belerica >>>>>>> from Dayal Singh College karnal >>>>>>> To: "indiantreepix" <[email protected]> >>>>>>> Date: Tuesday, August 9, 2011, 11:55 PM >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Dear All >>>>>>> Terminalia Belerica from Dayal Singh College Karnal >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> Regards >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Dr Balkar Singh >>>>>>> Head, Deptt. of Botany and Biotechnology >>>>>>> Arya P G College, Panipat >>>>>>> Haryana-132103 >>>>>>> 09416262964 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Regards >>>>>> >>>>>> Dr Balkar Singh >>>>>> Head, Deptt. of Botany and Biotechnology >>>>>> Arya P G College, Panipat >>>>>> Haryana-132103 >>>>>> 09416262964 >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Regards >>>>> >>>>> Dr Balkar Singh >>>>> Head, Deptt. of Botany and Biotechnology >>>>> Arya P G College, Panipat >>>>> Haryana-132103 >>>>> 09416262964 >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> - H.S. >>>> >>>> A scientific man ought to have no wishes, no affections, - a mere heart >>>> of stone >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> - H.S. >> >> A scientific man ought to have no wishes, no affections, - a mere heart of >> stone >> >> > > > -- - H.S. A scientific man ought to have no wishes, no affections, - a mere heart of stone
