I think the plant is Epipremnum pinnatum.
Regards
Pankaj

On Sep 17, 2:58 pm, anupam sarmah <[email protected]> wrote:
> Excellent!
> Now-a-days internet has really become very useful. 20 years back, can you
> think of gathering so much of info within such a short time?
>
> anupam
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Sat, Sep 17, 2011 at 12:13 PM, Madhuri Raut <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Thank you Anupamji
> > On the net I found the following interesting info about this plant
>
> > Rhaphidophora tetrasperma Hook. f.
>
> > Incorrectly as Amydrium tetrasperma
>
> > Common names: Amydrium 'Ginnie', Philodendron "Ginny", Mini monstera,
>
> > Miniature monstera, Philodendron imbe Ginny, Epipremnum "Ginny"
>
> > Mini split-leaf Philodendron
>
> > This species is not a Philodendron, Monstera, Epipremnum nor Amydrium
> > species
>
> > A member of the aroid tribe Monstereae, Rhaphidophora tetrasperma is a
> > native of Thailand and Malaysia that was identified to science in 1893.  
> > Based
> > on the information available,  Rhaphidophora tetrasperma is somewhat more
> > closely related to the genus Monstera than Philodendron as some discussions
> > on the internet attempt to imply.  However, neither genus is closely
> > related.  Aroid expert Julius Boos explains, "The genus Monstera and all
> > its relatives produce blooms with a bisexual spadix ,male and female flowers
> > throughout the length of the spadix, while the Philodendrons and their
> > relatives Homolamena and Furtadoa produce blooms with a unisexual spadix
> > with female flowers at its base with sterile and male flowers above the
> > female zone, which makes them very far apart and not close relatives even
> > though they may appear alike!"
>
> > Neither Philodendron nor Monstera species are found naturally outside
> > Central America, Mexico, South America and the Caribbean since they are
> > NeoTropical species.  The NeoTropics is defined as Mexico, Central
> > America, South America, the Caribbean and the southern tip of Florida.  The
> > genus Rhaphidophora is not found naturally in North or South America but
> > would then be a SE Asian equivalent with three Asian relatives including
> > members of the genera Epipremnum,  Amydrium, and Scindapsus.
>
> > Postings can be found on the internet as well as in the offerings of
> > internet plant sellers identifying this species as Amydrium tetrasperma,
> > Amydrium 'Ginnie', Philodendron "Ginnie", Philodendron imbe "Ginny", and
> > Epipremnum "Ginny".  All are scientifically incorrect.  The use of single
> > quotes implies a registered cultivar which also appears to be incorrect.  
> > Numerous
> > discussions have been held on aroid forums regarding some of these names,
> > and they are still commonly used on sites such as eBay.  A variegated form
> > is commonly available but the variegation is not natural in this species and
> > is reported to have been induced by a chemical process during the tissue
> > culture process. (see photo, below)  Growers have reported the
> > variegations vanishes as the plant grows since the chemicals eventually wear
> > off.
>
> > Tissue culture (known as TC) is the asexual propagation of fragments of a
> > suitable parent plant in order to produce identical clones of it in large
> > quantity. In the cells of the parent are grown in a laboratory in nutrient
> > solutions until they form a mass of tissue. These tissues then get different
> > chemicals to induce roots and leaves. Once developed the tiny plants are
> > transplanted into a potting medium and finally grown by the commercial plant
> > growing industry.
>
> > On several of the popular garden websites plant collectors repeatedly refer
> > to R. tetrasperma as a miniature form, or "mini" Monstera deliciosa  while
> > others continue to insist it is a form of Epipremnum.  This note from
> > expert aroid grower Michael Mattlage appears to sum up the correct
> > conclusion, "I know there was some debate a while back on whether the plant
> > labeled Amydrium, Philodendron, etc. etc. 'Ginny' was either a form of the
> > variable Epipremnum pinnatum or Rhaphidophora tetrasperma.  The experts
> > finally agreed with the later."   As indicated by Michael, the species
> > does also appear similar to the  adult form of Epipremnum pinnatum, but is
> > only a related species.
>
> > Rhaphidophora tetrasperma is not a miniature form of Monstera and in
> > February, 2007 aroid botanist Peter Boyce responded with this answer to a
> > question posted regarding the "miniature Monstera deliciosa" theory on the
> > forum Aroid l, "In the 90s while working on Rhaphidophora I investigated the
> > so-called miniature form of M. deliciosa in cultivation in Europe and as
> > named in Birdsey's Cultivated Aroids as 'Dwarf Ceriman' and these plants
> > were without exception Rhaphidophora tetrasperma from peninsular Malaysia
> > and southern Thailand.  At the time Josef (Bogner) had a large one
> > flowering in Munich and it was from here that I obtained inflorescences to
> > confirm the generic Id.  Material from this clone was later used by one of
> > my students Tam Shey May for molecular work on the Monstereae and embedded
> > in the Rhaphidophora clade as sister to R. nicolsonii from Pen. Malaysia
> > while M. deliciosa remained clustered with Stenopsermation and a
> > Rhodospatha.  Thus morphologically (ovules, seeds) and on the molecular
> > European 'Dwarf' Deliciosa' is a Rhaphidophora."
>
> > Some estimates indicate as many as one out of every eight plants known to
> > science have natural variability within their leaf forms.  They also
> > "morph" as they grow.  This link offers a more complete explanation of
> > natural variation within aroid species.  Once you complete reading the
> > information on this page please read this page on Natural Variation for a
> > non-technical explanation of how and why plants vary in appearance.  On
> > that page you wil find photos that demonstrate how aroids change their
> > appearance as they mature.
>
> > Rhaphidophora tetrasperma is scientifically described as being a "small to
> > medium sized" heterophyllous aroid.  A heterophyllous species is one that
> > is capable of having very dissimilar leaves on the same specimen.  A
> > deeply pinnatifid aroid,  R. tetrasperma  is easily confused with a small
> > Monstera deliciosa, but solely by appearance.   As Julius explained,
> > scientifically they are not closely related.
>
> > Rather than being stiff and leathery (coriaceous) as are the leaves of
> > Monstera deliciosa, the leaves are relatively thin and flexible.  
> > Pinnatified
> > species are those that produce leaves somewhat similar in shape to a feather
> > or a palm frond.  This species is not related to any palm.  The juvenile
> > form of Rhaphidophora tetrasperma is a shingling plant similar in appearance
> > to Rhaphidophora korthalsii as well as Rhaphidophora nicolsonii but may be
> > distinguished by a knowledgeable observer based on the petiole sheath and
> > leaf lamina characteristics.
>
> > Plants that begin their growth appressed are found growing in a
> > heteroblastic growth form known as "shingling" since they have the vague
> > appearance of the shingles or tiles on a roof.  The juvenile leaves have
> > this appearance due to very short petioles.  Heteroblasty is the
> > progressive change in growth from the juvenile shingle leaf to the
> > intermediate adult and finally into the adult form that stand away from the
> > host as a result of longer petioles and exhibit extreme changes in shape
> > along the way.  Shinglers grow extremely close to their host tree as
> > appressed epiphytes.  Appressed is "to press".
>
> > Rhaphidophora tetrasperma is quoted on the International Aroid Society
> > website as being rare in nature and is restricted to only a few sites on the
> > Malaysian peninsula near Kelantan and Perak as well as southern Thailand.
> > Very little has been published regarding this species in either scientific
> > or commercially available literature.  In the rain forest of SE Asia the
> > plant is a vine (liane) on the trees growing to a height of 5 meters (16
> > feet).  The plant is said to very rarely grow as a terrestrial species
> > preferring to climb.
>
> > Rhaphidophora tetrasperma clings to its host with a sparse quantity of
> > clasping roots from the nodes and internodes. The leaves can be ovate to a
> > combination of oval and lanceolate.  A lanceolate leaf blade is one that
> > is spear shaped.  The blades are not heavily coriaceous (leathery) and
> > measure from 10 to 34cm (4 to 13.3 inches).  Since it is known to be a
> > heterophyllus species, leaf variation should be expected.  Heterophylly
> > just means a plant can have very different appearing leaves on a single
> > specimen.
>
> > Regardless of the common belief a species is determined by the shape of the
> > leaf, that factor is rarely the final determination, especially in aroids.
> > Leaf variation among aroid species is extremely common and the shape of a
> > leaf alone cannot be used to accurately determine a species.  An
> > examination of the petiole supporting the leaf (commonly called the stem)
> > will show it has a shallow groove.  In its natural range the species is
> > found in dry to moist or wet forest as well as on sandstone and granite to
> > an elevation of 190 to 760 meters (625 to 2500 feet).  The maximum leaf
> > blade of our specimen in the photo above measures 16.5cm (6.5 inches).
>
> > Rhaphidophora tetrasperma is now commonly sold on eBay as a miniature
> > variegated Monstera, but most sellers have simply been mislead into
> > believing the plant they sell is something other than its true identity.  In
> > a recent conversation with one eBay seller I pointed out the variegated form
> > does not appear to be natural and was likely induced with chemicals during
> > the tissue culture process.  Tissue culture is where the DNA of a parent
> > plant is extracted and prepared in a laboratory and eventually grown into
> > tissue that can be potted eventually producing an artificially cloned
> > specimen.
>
> >  Since other sellers had told him he was foolish for accepting my opinion
> > I recommended we ask aroid botanist Peter Boyce in Malaysia for his opinion
> > whether or not the plant was a Rhaphidophora or a Monstera.  Pete is the
>
> ...
>
> read more »

Reply via email to