Thank you Sir Regards Bhagyashri On Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 5:32 PM, Gurcharan Singh <[email protected]> wrote:
> Madhuri ji > That is why the two are treated as synonyms > http://www.theplantlist.org/tpl/record/kew-2510469 > > Hortus Third the most complete book on cultivated plants treats them > synonyms > > Even GRIN which treats it as distinct species has this comment: > > "perhaps best treated as *M. paniculata* ‘Exotica’" > > > -- > Dr. Gurcharan Singh > Retired Associate Professor > SGTB Khalsa College, University of Delhi, Delhi-110007 > Res: 932 Anand Kunj, Vikas Puri, New Delhi-110018. > Phone: 011-25518297 Mob: 9810359089 > http://people.du.ac.in/~singhg45/ > > On Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 4:58 PM, Madhuri Raut <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Dear members >> Another link M. exotica & M. paniculata are not much differen. exotica >> has slightly larger flowers, paniculata has narrower petals & smaller >> flowers. >> http://www.botanicalgarden.ubc.ca/forums/showthread.php?t=16902 >> Regards >> Bhagyashri >> >> >> On Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 4:54 PM, Madhuri Raut <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Dear members, >>> Was studying on the net about M. paniculata and came across the >>> following link which states that the only difference in the two that is M. >>> paniculata and M Exotica is the size where M exotica is smalller that M >>> Paniculata but there is some overlap >>> >>> >>> http://www.weeds.org.au/cgi-bin/weedident.cgi?tpl=plant.tpl&ibra=all&card=S44 >>> >>> Regards >>> Bhagyashri >>> >>> On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 9:58 AM, Ushadi micromini < >>> [email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> Giby, HS et al... I am still waiting for the scentific BOTANICAl >>>> discussion... or knwledge... >>>> >>>> about this plant and its variants... etc... >>>> >>>> it would be good to know.. >>>> Usha di >>>> ===== >>>> >>>> On Jul 28, 3:21 pm, ushadi Micromini <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> > Yes... >>>> > so why dont you tell me about this plant? instead.. >>>> > thanks >>>> > Usha di >>>> > ====== >>>> > >>>> > On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 3:39 PM, Smilax004 <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> > > Dear Ushadiji, >>>> > >>>> > > Thanks for clarifying and sorry for the confusion. >>>> > > When I replied to the thread I think I missed (or there was some >>>> > > problem) the post by Vijayadas and I got confused then. >>>> > > Sorry again. I know Vijaysankar. >>>> > > Further, a request, if you feel that the argument is silly just >>>> leave >>>> > > it. We have so may serious things to discuss and learn. Why don't we >>>> > > try avoid silly arguments? >>>> > >>>> > > Regards, >>>> > > Giby >>>> > >>>> > > On Jul 28, 12:17 pm, Ushadi micromini <[email protected]> >>>> > > wrote: >>>> > > > Dear Giby: no ... Dr Raman was not correcting my Bengali / etc... >>>> > > > it was Vijayadas D who onJul 27, 2011 at 7: 52 typed the >>>> > > > following... >>>> > > > I am copying and pasting... >>>> > >>>> > > > Start quote...not "in bengali " in Bengla " >>>> > >>>> > > > I was responding to Vijayadas D. ; with my write up with >>>> > > > different scripts.... >>>> > > > JUST SCROLL UP A LITTLE AND YOU WILL GET TO HIS MESSAGE correcting >>>> > > > Bengali vs Bangal etc etc >>>> > > > Thats all >>>> > > > ===== >>>> > > > AND if you must know, Dr. V. Raman never gets into these silly >>>> > > > arguments... >>>> > > > from what I know of him from his writing... >>>> > > > he would never write something like that and with a typo to boot. >>>> > > > ====== >>>> > > > And Dear Giby: the same Dr Raman thought that you will be >>>> > > > able to answer my scientific questions posed above ... >>>> > > > can you? >>>> > > > will you? >>>> > > > thanks >>>> > > > Usha di.. >>>> > > > PS if you don't specialize in this field its ok.... >>>> >>> >>> >> > > >
