very much agreed Ushadi Thank you
Regards
Bhagyashri

On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 11:07 AM, ushadi Micromini <
microminipho...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Yes, that sort of longer duration gives time for an idea to percolate in
> peoples' memory banks, and they can keep an eye out for your query.
>
> Three days or even 15 days is too short a time for the experts to have
> arrived at a decision or have had time to think about one or two or ten such
> cases that they see...
>
> I say this because I have noticed that our experts are all very sincere and
> they all look at the pics diligently, and tell you something... one way or
> another...
> so if they did not say anything or arrive at a diagnosis ... perhaps it
> needs a rest... time to percolate...
>
> usha di
> ======
>
>
>
>
> On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 10:35 AM, J.M. Garg <jmga...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi, Madhuri ji,
>> 3 days as per guidelines are OK as after three days hardly anybody looks
>> at such threads.
>> However, as Singh ji stated we should try that we are able to resurface at
>> least within 15 days, which currently is three months.
>>
>> On 20 October 2011 19:17, Madhuri Raut <itii...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Yes. In fact I was surprised to see only 3 days gap in the older
>>> guidelines
>>> Regards
>>> Bhagyashri
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 7:13 PM, Gurcharan Singh <singh...@gmail.com>wrote:
>>>
>>>> Madhuri ji
>>>> Let us wait for atleast fifteen days, otherwise number of mails coming
>>>> in will increase greatly. Also backlog of 2 months has to be covered by
>>>> myself and Garg ji.
>>>>
>>>>  --
>>>> Dr. Gurcharan Singh
>>>> Retired  Associate Professor
>>>> SGTB Khalsa College, University of Delhi, Delhi-110007
>>>> Res: 932 Anand Kunj, Vikas Puri, New Delhi-110018.
>>>> Phone: 011-25518297  Mob: 9810359089
>>>> http://people.du.ac.in/~singhg45/
>>>>
>>>>   On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 6:57 PM, Madhuri Raut <itii...@gmail.com>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Gurcharan ji Thank you
>>>>> just one query
>>>>> has there been a change in the duration required for Resurfacing as
>>>>> when I was given the following link for guidelines when I newly joined the
>>>>> group
>>>>> https://sites.google.com/site/efloraofindia/posting-guidelines
>>>>>
>>>>> it states that in point no 10
>>>>>
>>>>> 10. Members are requested to forward Id. requests/ confirmation mails
>>>>> again in case there is no response for about 3 days on the group.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I thought it is 3 days I did not know it has changed to 15 days.
>>>>>
>>>>> I am sorry I have posted for Resurfacing following the old guidelines
>>>>>
>>>>> Thank you for informing about the change
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards
>>>>>
>>>>> Bhagyashri
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 6:26 PM, Gurcharan Singh 
>>>>> <singh...@gmail.com>wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> AND PLEASE TAKE CARE. ONLY THOSE MAILS WHICH ARE 15 DAYS OR MORE OLDER
>>>>>> SHOULD BE RESURFACED AND FOR SUBSEQUENT RESURFACING THERE SHOULD AGAIN 
>>>>>> BE A
>>>>>> GAP OF 15 DAYS OR MORE.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Dr. Gurcharan Singh
>>>>>> Retired  Associate Professor
>>>>>> SGTB Khalsa College, University of Delhi, Delhi-110007
>>>>>> Res: 932 Anand Kunj, Vikas Puri, New Delhi-110018.
>>>>>> Phone: 011-25518297  Mob: 9810359089
>>>>>> http://people.du.ac.in/~singhg45/
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 6:04 PM, Ushadi micromini <
>>>>>> microminipho...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Well said, Gurcharanji
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I want to add that starting new threads only adds to the number of
>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>> threads that need to be classified in our website... which task at
>>>>>>> present falls to Garg ji, Dinesh ji and Gurcharanji... i think...
>>>>>>> so it behooves us not to increase their work load...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ITS ALSO IMPORTANT TO KEEP YOU OWN THREADS AS NEARLY COMPLETE AS
>>>>>>> POSSIBLE>>> IF YOU DID NOT THINK THAT YOU HAD ENOUGH INFO OR IF YOU
>>>>>>> THINK ID WAS NOT DEFINITELY ESTABLISHED KEEP TACK OF IT AND REFURCAE
>>>>>>> IT AS PER GUIDELINE GIVEN BY DR SINGH ABOVE>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> thanks Usha di
>>>>>>> =======
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Oct 20, 5:14 pm, Gurcharan Singh <singh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> > Dear friends
>>>>>>> > For a long time myself and Garg ji have been performing the job of
>>>>>>> > resurfacing older mails which have not been identified
>>>>>>> conclusively, but the
>>>>>>> > job gets delayed when we have to go out for a long time to a place
>>>>>>> where we
>>>>>>> > can't devote enough time on net. It is heartening in such
>>>>>>> circumstances to
>>>>>>> > find some members doing the job of resurfacing, although they may
>>>>>>> be
>>>>>>> > resurfacing their own uploads. Earlier Muthu ji had been doing
>>>>>>> this, and now
>>>>>>> > Bhagyashree ji. More members may like to resurface their old mails,
>>>>>>> or those
>>>>>>> > of others, or for s specific date span for all. The following
>>>>>>> guidelines
>>>>>>> > should be kept in mind while resurfacing.
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> > 1. Please don't start a new mail to include your photographs. This
>>>>>>> will
>>>>>>> > result in breaking with old thread. Go to the original thread,
>>>>>>> locate the
>>>>>>> > mail that contains photographs (usually the first mail of thread,
>>>>>>> unless you
>>>>>>> > forgot to attach photographs in first), open it and click *Forward
>>>>>>> > button *under
>>>>>>>  > it.
>>>>>>> > 2. In the new mail window that opens type the address of this
>>>>>>> > group "efloraofindia" <indiantreepix@googlegroups.com>(it should
>>>>>>> come up
>>>>>>> > automatically when you just type ef., after coma type the email ID
>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>> > original poster, and email IDs of few experts in that Group/area
>>>>>>> (Western
>>>>>>> > Ghats/Northern India/Himalayas/NE India/orchids/composites/garden
>>>>>>> plants,
>>>>>>> > etc that you know from your experience.
>>>>>>> > 3. In main window start with line "Resurfacing for ID/ID
>>>>>>> confirmation. in
>>>>>>> > next few lines include what have been previous relevant comments.
>>>>>>> > 4. Send the mail. You need not attach fresh photographs unless you
>>>>>>> have some
>>>>>>> > more photographs to add. Your original photographs would get
>>>>>>> attached when
>>>>>>> > you press forward button.
>>>>>>> > 5. Please don't change the subject line at all, or else the thread
>>>>>>> will get
>>>>>>> > broken.
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> > Happy resurfacing
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> > --
>>>>>>> > Dr. Gurcharan Singh
>>>>>>> > Retired  Associate Professor
>>>>>>> > SGTB Khalsa College, University of Delhi, Delhi-110007
>>>>>>> > Res: 932 Anand Kunj, Vikas Puri, New Delhi-110018.
>>>>>>> > Phone: 011-25518297  Mob: 9810359089
>>>>>>> http://people.du.ac.in/~singhg45/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> With regards,
>> J.M.Garg (jmga...@gmail.com)
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Jmgarg1
>> 'Creating awareness of Indian Flora & Fauna'
>> The whole world uses my Image Resource of more than a *thousand species*& 
>> eight thousand images of Birds, Butterflies, Plants etc. (arranged
>> alphabetically & place-wise):
>> http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:J.M.Garg. You can also use
>> them for free as per Creative Commons license attached with each image.
>> For identification, learning, discussion & documentation of Indian Flora,
>> please visit/ join our Efloraofindia Google e-group:
>> http://groups.google.co.in/group/indiantreepix (more than 1725 members &
>> 85,000 messages on 30/9/11) or Efloraofindia website:
>> https://sites.google.com/site/efloraofindia/ (with a species database
>> of around 5500 species).
>> Also author of 'A Photoguide to the Birds of Kolkata & Common Birds of
>> India'.
>>
>>
>

Reply via email to