Mahadeswara ji, there should be no difference. Neil ji's plant has twined around an armed shrub. The difference in leaves among plants in mine and Neil ji's photographs are due to their ages.
Here are all the views of *Cynanchum tunicatum* at my flickr photostream: http://www.flickr.com/search/?q=Cynanchumtunicatum&w=91314344%40N00&m=tags Flowers do not show any difference. This said, others may validate my point. Regards. Dinesh On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 6:31 PM, Neil Soares <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Dr.Swamy, > This climber was identifed by Dr.Almeida from photographs of a previous > years flowering. > With regards, > Neil Soares. > > --- On *Mon, 10/24/11, Mahadeswara <[email protected]>* wrote: > > > From: Mahadeswara <[email protected]> > Subject: [efloraofindia:89529] Re: Cynanchum tunicatum flowering > To: "efloraofindia" <[email protected]> > Date: Monday, October 24, 2011, 6:24 PM > > > Neil ji, > I checked the photograph in flowers of India ( link:http:// > www.flowersofindia.in/catalog/slides/Coated%20Swallow-Wort.html). The > plant photographed and identified by Dinesh valke ji looks > different. I do not know any thing about this plant. One of you may > clarify as to which is correct or any eco-typic variation exists . > > On Oct 24, 3:30 pm, Neil Soares > <[email protected]<http://us.mc339.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]>> > wrote: > > Hi, > > Was at my bungalow in Khandala yesterday. Panchali was flowering. > Sending a few photographs. > > With regards, > > Neil Soares. > > > > Cynanchum tunicatum, Panchali 1.jpg > > 72KViewDownload > > > > Cynanchum tunicatum, Panchali 2.jpg > > 76KViewDownload > >
