Thanks a lot Rajdeo Singhji and Gibyji for possible ID.

Ha Ha............ Thanks Pankaj for detailed analysis and the ID. I know ur
aptitude towards orchids. Its my limitation again i have to wait another
year to cross check these with the live specimen. U r right, there are 3
spcies which the field assistant reported which are of same name as per the
local baidya. I wl check it once i go to field.

Regards

Prasad

On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 2:16 PM, Dr Pankaj Kumar <[email protected]>wrote:

> You will be surprised Gibs, that cant be Peristylus. Ovary is not
> parallel to the stalk.
> The first one to me is Habenaria plantaginea and the other two are
> Habenaria furcifera.
>
> BUT IT CANT BE CONFIRMED LIKE THIS.
>
> Prasad, if you can see, the leaves in first pic is appressed on the
> ground, but in other two, its slightly raised with wavy margin. These
> form important characters at times. Secondly, assuming that all pics
> were taken  on the same day, pic one is in buds where as other two are
> in new fruits. Plant identification in such case becomes tricky and
> our identification and our credibility is at risk if we incorrectly
> identify the plants. If it goes wrong, people point fingers on us. I
> was once checkign some orchids in Delhi University and I told some
> names to them. By mistake they might have heard wrongly so they wrote
> incorrectly on the sheet. A second person came and saw those sheets
> and then he abused and insulted me in front of every one. Though it
> was not my fault. Similar were the reason why one of our friend HS got
> annoyed and angry on and reacted rudely few days back.
>
> Be happy I wrote all these in good sense... :)
> Enjoy
> Pankaj
>
>
>
>
>
> On Nov 1, 3:37 pm, rajdeo singh <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Hi,
> > it looks like *Habenaria ovalifolia *Wight
> >
> > Rajdeo Singh
> > Project fellow
> > St. Xavier's College,
> > Mumbai
>



-- 
Prasad Kumar Dash
Ecologist, Orissa, India
email: [email protected]
ph. 09437444241

Reply via email to