You are absolutely right sir. I think we should use a scale as a measuring
tool during photography along with all of your suggestions.

Regards

prasad

On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 11:58 AM, Gurcharan Singh <[email protected]> wrote:

> Thanks for appreciation Prasad ji
> Actually when the group was first started, people knew plants by their
> flowers only. For las few years I have been stressing the importance of
> other parts of plant. I have often written on this forum that if members
> supply at least 3-4 good photographs, identification process would be much
> simpler.
> 1. A photograph of habit in which leaves and position of flowers is
> visible.
> 2. Close up of side view of flower to show bract (if present), pedicel,
> calyx and relative size of calyx and corolla
> 3. top view close up of flower to show petals, stamens and carpels
> 4. Fruit if available.
>
> In recent days I have also been impressing upon the need to have
> measurements but putting some sort of scale, since zooming can highly
> distort the size estimation.
>
> --
> Dr. Gurcharan Singh
> Retired  Associate Professor
> SGTB Khalsa College, University of Delhi, Delhi-110007
> Res: 932 Anand Kunj, Vikas Puri, New Delhi-110018.
> Phone: 011-25518297  Mob: 9810359089
> http://people.du.ac.in/~singhg45/
>
>
>
>
> On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 11:40 AM, prasad dash <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>> Sir almost all of ur photos are new for me as they are from different
>> phytogeographic zone. I think one don't not need any live speciem for
>> identification of floral characters once he go through your image
>> (especially this one now).
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> prasad
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 8:58 PM, Balkar Singh <[email protected]>wrote:
>>
>>> Superb Catch Sir
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 8:08 PM, Satish Phadke <[email protected]>wrote:
>>>
>>>> I am really afraid of attempting Asteraceae IDs
>>>> Good to see so many Asteraceae plants from you.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 5:36 PM, Gurcharan Singh <[email protected]>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> *Inula royleana* DC., Prodr. 5:464. 1836
>>>>>
>>>>> Graceful alpine herb similar to Inula grandiflora in producing a
>>>>> single terminal head on long peduncle but very distinct in its larger
>>>>> (15-25 cm long as against 5-8 cm) basal leaves, distinctly clasping (and
>>>>> not sessile or subsessile) larger leaves up to 15 cm long, and larger head
>>>>> (10-12 cm across as against 5-7 cm), ray florets slender, golden yellow,
>>>>> nearly 5-6 cm long (as against 2 cm), involucre bracts ovate.
>>>>>
>>>>> Photographed Apharwat mountain at altitude of 3200 m in July.
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Dr. Gurcharan Singh
>>>>> Retired  Associate Professor
>>>>> SGTB Khalsa College, University of Delhi, Delhi-110007
>>>>> Res: 932 Anand Kunj, Vikas Puri, New Delhi-110018.
>>>>> Phone: 011-25518297  Mob: 9810359089
>>>>> http://people.du.ac.in/~singhg45/
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Dr Satish Phadke
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Regards
>>>
>>> Dr Balkar Singh
>>> Head, Deptt. of Botany and Biotechnology
>>> Arya P G College, Panipat
>>> Haryana-132103
>>> 09416262964
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Prasad Kumar Dash
>> Ecologist, Orissa, India
>> email: [email protected]
>> ph. 09437444241
>>
>
>
>
>


-- 
Prasad Kumar Dash
Ecologist, Orissa, India
email: [email protected]
ph. 09437444241

Reply via email to