Thank you Manudev ji, Mayur ji and Gurcharan ji for explaining the differentiating characters in details . @Mayur ji In case of typical variety i.e var. *fasciculta .....do the.*filamental hairs have to be bicolored? or can they be only white?
Thank you On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 2:10 PM, Gurcharan Singh <[email protected]> wrote: > *Cyanotis fasciculata:* Section Encyanotis-cymes enclosed in biseriate > falcately lanceolate imbricating bracteoles; annual, dwarf, decumbent, > floccosely silky or hairy; leaves linear or lanceolate, 2.5-5 cm long; > petals rose-purple; capsule oblong > > *Cyanotis axillaris*: section ochreaeflora-flowers axillary in sheaths of > leaves, bracteoles small not imbricating;annual, sparsely hairy or > glabrous; leaves 5-15 cm long; petals blue > > > -- > Dr. Gurcharan Singh > Retired Associate Professor > SGTB Khalsa College, University of Delhi, Delhi-110007 > Res: 932 Anand Kunj, Vikas Puri, New Delhi-110018. > Phone: 011-25518297 Mob: 9810359089 > http://people.du.ac.in/~singhg45/ > > > On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 1:22 PM, Mayur Nandikar > <[email protected]>wrote: > >> Yes Manudev ji you are right. This is *Cyanotis fasciculata *var. * >> glabrescens.* >> * >> * >> In case of this variety ...................Plant is glabrous and adopted >> to high altitude habitat, having monocoloured moniliform hairs on the >> filament and seeds are having striations on it surfaces. >> >> In case of typical variety i.e var. *fasciculta ...........*Plant is >> covered with cobwebby hairs, more succulent habit, occurs in low land even >> in xeric habitat, filamental hairs are bicoloured and seeds are without any >> striations on while more pitted. >> >> Thank you >> >> >> >> On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 12:14 PM, Madhuri Raut <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> how to differentiate between Cyanotis axillaris and Cyanotis >>> fasciculata var. glabrescens? >>> >>> On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 10:44 AM, manudev madhavan < >>> [email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> This could be Cyanotis fasciculata var. glabrescens.. >>>> >>>> regards >>>> >>>> On Nov 18, 6:25 am, Dr Pankaj Kumar <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> > May be Cyanotis axillaris >>>> > Pankaj >>>> > >>>> > On Nov 17, 10:23 pm, Satish Nikam <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > > Dear Friends, >>>> > > Which Cyanotis sp. is it? >>>> > > date/time:sept11 >>>> > > location:mulshi,pune >>>> > > habitat:wild >>>> > > plant habit:herb >>>> > > height:tiny >>>> > > leaves:-- >>>> > > thanks >>>> > > regards >>>> > > satish nikam >>>> > > my photoshttp://www.flickr.com/photos/wwwssncomphotos >>>> > >>>> > > IMG_6398-e.jpg >>>> > > 43KViewDownload >>>> > >>>> > > img_6412.jpg-e.jpg >>>> > > 30KViewDownload >>>> > >>>> > > IMG_6413-e.jpg >>>> > > 32KViewDownload >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Regards >>> Dr.Bhagyashri Ranade >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Mr. Mayur D. Nandikar, >> Research Student, >> Department of Botany, >> Shivaji University, >> Kolhapur. >> 07507013607 >> >> > > > -- Regards Dr.Bhagyashri Ranade
