looking into more details, it look more closer to Cordia myxa, i thought C.
myxa and C. sinensis are synonyms but after going through details i saw
different characters of both the species..

http://apps.kew.org/herbcat/getImage.do?imageBarcode=K000418702

regards,

On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 5:59 PM, Gurcharan Singh <[email protected]> wrote:

> If this plant id Cordia sinensis, then what is this??
>
>
> http://www.zimbabweflora.co.zw/speciesdata/image-display.php?species_id=148260&image_id=2
>
>
> http://www.zimbabweflora.co.zw/speciesdata/image-display.php?species_id=148260&image_id=1
>
> Surely the two are different
> In Cordia sinensis (syn: C. gharaf Forssk; C. rothii Roem. & sch.),
> corolla lobes are much narrower, 4 in number and reflexed. The above plant
> seems to have 5, much broader corolla lobes which are spreading. lso flower
> are too large for cordia.
>
> http://www.efloras.org/object_page.aspx?object_id=91875&flora_id=5
>
>
> --
> Dr. Gurcharan Singh
> Retired  Associate Professor
> SGTB Khalsa College, University of Delhi, Delhi-110007
> Res: 932 Anand Kunj, Vikas Puri, New Delhi-110018.
> Phone: 011-25518297  Mob: 9810359089
> http://people.du.ac.in/~singhg45/
>
> On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 3:40 PM, Dr Pankaj Kumar 
> <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>> I think H S is right. There is only one plant in the pic. What ever it
>> is!!! :)
>> Regards
>> Pankaj
>>
>>
>> On Nov 23, 5:46 pm, H S <[email protected]> wrote:
>> > sorry, but there is no two object in the photo, its an Cordia sinensis,
>> and
>> > not C. dichotoma... according to the location provided by Aarti ji, and
>> i
>> > know that no climber growing on that tree..
>> >
>> > those who are confused please check the photo again..
>> >
>> > even i request Artiji to upload more photos or give more information if
>> any
>> > climber growing on tree..
>> >
>> > regards,
>> >
>> > On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 10:21 AM, Aarti S. Khale <[email protected]
>> >wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > > Satish ji,
>> > > Thanks for finally confirming the id.
>> > > Regards,
>> > > Aarti
>> >
>> > > On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 9:52 AM, Satish N. Pardeshi <
>> > > [email protected]> wrote:
>> >
>> > >> hello all
>> > >> the flowering plant in picture is Cordia domestica>> the leaves and
>> > >> the buds clearly indicated towards cordia.
>> > >>http://iscmumbai.maharashtra.gov.in/Fig570-584.htm
>> >
>> > >> the leaves of Vallaris solanacea are acute which is not the case here
>> >
>> > >>
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Vallaris_solanacea_(Vish_Vallari)_i...
>> > >> .
>> > >> Aarti ji the location which you are referring is the same where i
>> > >> observed Cordia domestica at VJBU.
>> >
>> > >> regards
>> > >> satish pardeshi
>> >
>> > >> On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 7:03 PM, Aarti S. Khale <
>> [email protected]>
>> > >> wrote:
>> > >> > H S ji,
>> > >> > When you are going towards the Nursery, you have the offices on
>> your
>> > >> right.
>> > >> > Just before the offices begin, on the right itself is this small
>> tree.
>> > >> > Had been there a couple of days ago, saw the tree, no flowers now.
>> > >> > There is a Sita asoka tree on the left, just opposite it on the
>> right a
>> > >> > little inside the road.
>> > >> > I don't think any climber is growing on it.
>> > >> > Regards,
>> > >> > Aarti
>> >
>> > >> > On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 2:12 PM, H S <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >
>> > >> >> hello, i do not think its Vallaris, leaves are not opposite here,
>> to
>> > >> me it
>> > >> >> look like Cordia.., in Victoria garden Vallaris is present on Lion
>> > >> cage....
>> > >> >> Arti ji pls if you can give us the exact location in Victoria
>> garden,
>> > >> it
>> > >> >> would be easy to identify the small tree...
>> > >> >> regards,
>> >
>> > >> >> On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 10:33 AM, J.M. Garg <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > >> >>> Forwarding again for Id confirmation or otherwise please.
>> > >> >>> Some earlier relevant feedback:
>> > >> >>> “Vallaris solanacea(heynei) climber flowering on a medium sized
>> tree
>> > >> >>> of Cordia dichotoma (myxa). Regards, Shrikant”
>> >
>> > >> >>> “it is
>> >
>> > >> >>> Cordia domestica Roth., Nov. Pl. Sp. 123, 1821; Almeida, Fl.
>> Mah. 3:
>> > >> >>> 295, 2001; Singh et al, Fl. Mah. St. 2: 417, 2001.
>> > >> >>> Synonyms: C. myxa L. var. domestica Cl. in Hook.f., FI. Brit.
>> Ind. 4:
>> > >> >>> 140, 1883. C. fulvosa Wt. Icon. t. 1380, 1850; Cooke, Fl. Pres.
>> Bombay
>> > >> >>> 2: 267, 1958 (Repr.)
>> > >> >>> i collected it from Bangur nagar, Goregaon, Mumbai and
>> subsequently
>> > >> >>> observed it at VJBU, opposite office.
>> > >> >>>  here is a key for distinguishing the species
>> > >> >>> 1. Corolla
>> white.....................................................2
>> > >> >>>  2. Fruiting calyx not
>> ribbed....................................3
>> > >> >>>  3. Filament hairy at base; Fruit up to 2.5 cm...........C.
>> dichotoma
>> > >> >>>  3. Filament glabrous; Fruit up to 1.2 cm long...........C.
>> sinensis
>> > >> >>>  2. Fruiting calyx ribbed
>> ..........................................C.
>> > >> >>> domestica
>> > >> >>> 1. Corolla
>> > >> orange......................................................
>> > >> >>> 4
>> > >> >>>  4. Leaves rough; Ripe fruit
>> white...............................C.
>> > >> >>> sebastina
>> > >> >>>  4. Leaves not rough; Ripe fruit brown.........................C.
>> > >> >>> subcordata
>> > >> >>> Regards
>> > >> >>> satish pardeshi”
>> >
>> > >> >>> “Satish sir i think plant is Cordia sinensis, there are many
>> trees in
>> > >> the
>> > >> >>> gardens of this species... one at the corner of the office and
>> one
>> > >> near the
>> > >> >>> Gustavia tree....
>> >
>> > >> >>> there is Vallaris only on Lion cage in Rani baug....
>> >
>> > >> >>>  - H.S.”
>> >
>> > >> >>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> > >> >>> From: Aarti S. Khale <[email protected]>
>> > >> >>> Date: 10 May 2011 17:04
>> > >> >>> Subject: [efloraofindia:69148] Tree for ID : 100511 : AK-1
>> > >> >>> To: efloraofindia <[email protected]>
>> >
>> > >> >>> Taken at Jijamata Udyan or Rani Baug, Mumbai, Maharashtra on the
>> 10th
>> > >> >>> of April, 2008.
>> > >> >>> A medium sized tree with tiny white flowers.
>> > >> >>> Aarti
>> >
>> > >> >>> --
>> > >> >>> With regards,
>> > >> >>> J.M.Garg ([email protected])
>> > >> >>>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Jmgarg1
>> > >> >>> 'Creating awareness of Indian Flora & Fauna'
>> > >> >>> The whole world uses my Image Resource of more than a thousand
>> > >> species &
>> > >> >>> eight thousand images of Birds, Butterflies, Plants etc.
>> (arranged
>> > >> >>> alphabetically & place-wise):
>> > >> >>>http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:J.M.Garg. You can also
>> > >> use them
>> > >> >>> for free as per Creative Commons license attached with each
>> image.
>> > >> >>> For identification, learning, discussion & documentation of
>> Indian
>> > >> Flora,
>> > >> >>> please visit/ join our Efloraofindia Google e-group:
>> > >> >>>http://groups.google.co.in/group/indiantreepix(more than 1740
>> > >> members &
>> > >> >>> 90,000 messages on 31/10/11) or Efloraofindia website:
>> > >> >>>https://sites.google.com/site/efloraofindia/(with a species
>> database
>> > >> >>> of more than 6000 species).
>> > >> >>> Also author of 'A Photoguide to the Birds of Kolkata & Common
>> Birds of
>> > >> >>> India'.
>> >
>> > >> >> --
>> > >> >>  - H.S.
>> > >> >> A scientific man ought to have no wishes, no affections, - a mere
>> > >> heart of
>> > >> >> stone
>> >
>> > >> --
>> > >> EACH ONE.... PLANT ONE...
>> > >> Satish Pardeshi
>> > >> Plant Taxonomist
>> > >> Mumbai, Pune
>> >
>> > --
>> >  - H.S.
>> >
>> > A scientific man ought to have no wishes, no affections, - a mere heart
>> of
>> > stone
>>
>
>
>
>


-- 
 - H.S.

A scientific man ought to have no wishes, no affections, - a mere heart of
stone

Reply via email to