Vijaysankar ji Many many thanks for this very nice way of compilation. It is really hard to detect and delete the repetitions. A great work indeed.
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 10:28 PM, Vijayasankar <[email protected]>wrote: > Nice work Satish ji. > > I tried to count the total taxa using your data. For convenience I changed > the format, and used 'Subtotal' function in Excel. > As per this, your compilation shows *207* unique taxa, coming under *77 > *genera. > Few repeated names were deleted. > Crotalaria has highest number of taxa (19), followed by Indigofera and > Desmodium, 15 & 14, respectively. 39 genera have single species in each. > Please view the attached file, which has 3 worksheets. Hope this helps. > > Regards > > Vijayasankar Raman > National Center for Natural Products Research > University of Mississippi > > > > On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 9:35 AM, Dinesh Valke <[email protected]>wrote: > >> Satish ji ... apologies ! I am real bad at Excel's mathematics and >> formulae. >> Am sure someone in our group is good at this, and would help Satish ji. >> Regards. >> Dinesh >> >> >> >> >> >> On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 8:57 PM, Satish Phadke <[email protected]>wrote: >> >>> Dnesh ji >>> After using the COUNTA function correctly to count the total filled >>> cells in the Excell sheet the number comes to 362 rather than 280. Will you >>> please recheck? >>> Crotalaria has maximum species : 21; Indigofera : 16; Desmodium >>> :15;Vigna: 10; Smithia :9; Erythrina: 8; Dalbergia: 7; Alysicarpus :6; >>> Trifolium: 6; Tephrosia:6 ;Medicago :6; >>> In 35 genera only one species each was discussed. >>> Some plants esp. posted by Raju ji and Ritesh ji from Andaman and North >>> east remain to be unidentified. >>> >>> On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 8:34 PM, Dinesh Valke <[email protected]>wrote: >>> >>>> Nice way of summarizing the week's collection, Satish ji. >>>> Regards. >>>> Dinesh >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 8:29 PM, Satish Phadke <[email protected]>wrote: >>>> >>>>> Sorry for the delay. >>>>> I wanted to compile all the data much earlier. >>>>> Luckily I am happy to post it here before the end of the month >>>>> November 2011. >>>>> Attaching an excel file containing the names of all the plants from >>>>> Papilionaceae discussed during the Family week. >>>>> Neglecting some minor mistakes or errors due to repetition of synonym >>>>> etc we roughly discuused 77 genera during the week and 280 species. >>>>> This includes a large number of plants mainly form Western ghats, >>>>> Himalayan plants, plants from Jammu and >>>>> Kashmir,HP,U,.Karnataka,Odisha,Tamil nadu,Bengal as well as some from USA >>>>> and Australia. >>>>> We had some really unusual contributions from Andaman and Northeast >>>>> India too. Some of which still remain unidentified. Vijaysankar ji >>>>> cntributed some unusual plants from his collections too. Ushaprabha ji was >>>>> in Australia at that time so we were lucky to see some plants from there >>>>> too. >>>>> Thanks and Regards >>>>> Dr Satish Phadke >>>>> >>>>> On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 12:15 PM, Satish Phadke >>>>> <[email protected]>wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Very good start. Fabaceae is a big family. Its presence is almost >>>>>> everywhere mostly tropical and warm temperate Asia and America. >>>>>> I am sure each member will come up at least with few species. >>>>>> The record on my mail shows that Gurcharan ji posted his mails 2min >>>>>> before the start of the 7th Nov 2011 to reach it on The day. I posted a >>>>>> minute later. >>>>>> >>>>>> Till 12 noon today (That is in 12 hrs) I have some 80 mails with the >>>>>> label *Fabaceae-Faboideae (Papilionaceae) Week* in my inbox* >>>>>> >>>>>> Great going indeed . For those who don't know: one can copy paste >>>>>> this heading from here for uniformity of mails. You can add a label to >>>>>> track the mails under this heading if you are using Gmail. >>>>>> Regards >>>>>> *Dr Satish Phadke >>>>>> http://satishphadke.blogspot.com/<http://www.satishphadke.blogspot.com> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Dr Satish Phadke >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Dr Satish Phadke >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Dr Satish Phadke >>> >> >> > -- Dr Satish Phadke
