Concluding Muthu ji's posted plant to be *Senna multiglandulosa* ...
discussed at
https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!topic/indiantreepix/MSjTb66pri4
Regards.
Dinesh



On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 6:31 PM, Gurcharan Singh <[email protected]> wrote:

> Leaves with 4-6 pairs of leaflets, leaflets farinose beneath and young
> shoots hairy, pod with more than 20 seeds, longer, stalk of pod 10-20 mm
> all point to Senna sulphurea (syn: Cassia glauca).
>
> http://www.efloras.org/object_page.aspx?object_id=117005&flora_id=2
>
> http://www.efloras.org/florataxon.aspx?flora_id=2&taxon_id=130094
>
>
> --
> Dr. Gurcharan Singh
> Retired  Associate Professor
> SGTB Khalsa College, University of Delhi, Delhi-110007
> Res: 932 Anand Kunj, Vikas Puri, New Delhi-110018.
> Phone: 011-25518297  Mob: 9810359089
> http://people.du.ac.in/~singhg45/
>
> On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 3:54 PM, H S <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> very difficult, but also can be checked with Cassia surattensis, now may
>> be changed to Senna surattensis
>>
>> regards,
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 1:21 AM, Dinesh Valke <[email protected]>wrote:
>>
>>> POST resurfaced for seeking ID
>>>
>>> *Earlier relevant feedback*:
>>>
>>>
>>> Possibily it is *Cassia biflora*
>>> Promila Chaturvedi
>>>
>>>
>>> *Not Cassia biflora* atleast
>>> Dr. Gurcharan Singh
>>>
>>>
>>> *Not C. biflora*
>>> Muthu Karthick
>>>
>>>
>>> this might be *Cassia auriculata *
>>> Mohandass Bheemsingh
>>>
>>>
>>> This is certainly *not C. auriculata*
>>>  Muthu Karthick
>>>
>>>
>>> The plant is turning out to be interesting and elusive with narrow
>>> thicker pubescent leaves. Foliar glands should help.
>>> Dr. Gurcharan Singh
>>>
>>>
>>> Looks like *Cassia bahamensis*, based on the leaves (origin South
>>> Asia). In the absence of details of flowers (number of petals,stamens,
>>> fertile or infertile etc.) it is difficult to confirm.
>>> Dr. Mahadeswara Swamy
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> As per my opinion.. may be *Cassia surattensis* Burm.f var glauca (Lam.
>>> ) K. & S. OR *C.S. var. surattensis*..
>>> (Ref: YadavS.R. and M.M. Sardesai 2002. Flora of Kolhapur District.
>>> p.170 & 174)
>>>  Parjanya Guru
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Quite likely *Cassia bahamensis* ?
>>> Satish Chile
>>>
>>>
>>> *Cassia sophera *
>>> Shrikant Ingalhalikar
>>>
>>>
>>> *Not Cassia sophera* for sure
>>> Satish Pardeshi
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Regards.
>>> Dinesh
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>> From: Gurcharan Singh <[email protected]>
>>> Date: Tue, May 18, 2010 at 4:20 PM
>>> Subject: Fwd: [indiantreepix:26032] Cassia for id 050110MK3
>>> To: efloraofindia <[email protected]>, Muthu Karthick <
>>> [email protected]>, Kenneth Greby <[email protected]>, Dinesh Valke <
>>> [email protected]>, Neil Soares <[email protected]>
>>>
>>>
>>> Resurfacing again for Id
>>> Several species have been suggested but no consensus
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Dr. Gurcharan Singh
>>> Retired  Associate Professor
>>>
>>> SGTB Khalsa College, University of Delhi, Delhi-110007
>>> Res: 932 Anand Kunj, Vikas Puri, New Delhi-110018.
>>> Phone: 011-25518297  Mob: 9810359089
>>> http://people.du.ac.in/~singhg45/
>>>
>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>> From: Muthu Karthick <[email protected]>
>>>  Date: Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 8:58 PM
>>> Subject: [indiantreepix:26032] Cassia for id 050110MK3
>>> To: indiantreepix <[email protected]>
>>>
>>>
>>> Dear all,
>>> Please id this Cassia sp. a small tree found planted as ornamental in
>>> Ooty houses.
>>> Date: 03 Jan 2010
>>>
>>> --
>>> Muthu Karthick, N
>>> Junior Research Fellow
>>> Care Earth
>>> Chennai
>>> www.careearthtrust.org
>>>
>>> --
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>> Groups "indiantreepix" group.
>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>>> [email protected].
>>> For more options, visit this group at
>>> http://groups.google.com/group/indiantreepix?hl=en.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>  - H.S.
>>
>> A scientific man ought to have no wishes, no affections, - a mere heart
>> of stone
>>
>>
>
>
>

Reply via email to