I am bumping this thread again.

I wonder if any of this group live near Darjeeling????

Maybe some kind soul be willing to collect a live specimen fromTiger
Hill,  and take it to the Herbarium at the Lloyd Botanic Garden.

Hopefully the local botanists there would be able to give an accurate
id of a very very common shrub in their  local area.

OR

 maybe someone has contacts at Llloyds Botanic garden and the
botanists could  then be pointed to my thread.
or  even make a personal inspection of a living shrub.
I tried to get an e mail address. But none shows on www, so maybe they
do not have an internet connection there.

Hopefully.... Sheila.

=============================================

On Oct 30, 5:22 pm, Vijayasankar <vijay.botan...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Sheila, I think Giby wanted to only compare the stigmas in "*Lasianthus*"
> and in the plant in discussion.
>
> Flora of China says stigma lobes 3-9. Even in the poster picture, I see
> multiple stigmas clustered together on a common style, as we see in the
> picture in Giby's link. My doubt is the shape of stigma lobes...FoC says
> they are "linear or lanceolate" which is not the case in our plant. But our
> plant also has multiple stigmas but appear as capitate. I see more than 6
> lobes here.
>
> Number of corolla lobes is variable in Lasianthus (4-6).
>
> Hope someone in the group will come up with convincing id for this plant...
>
> Regards
>
> Vijayasankar Raman
> National Center for Natural Products Research
> University of Mississippi
>
> On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 11:40 AM, Plantaholic Sheila <
>
>
>
> luddite1...@talktalk.net> wrote:
> > Sorry Giby.
> >  I really appreciate all your help and do not wish to appear
> > ungrateful.
>
> > However, Lasianthus parvifolius is not at all like it.
>
> > My mystery shrub has 5 petals not 4.
>
> > I found this pic showing the leaves.
>
> >http://www.biotik.org/india/species/l/lasiparv/lasiparv_05_en.html
>
> > It just doesn't come close to my amateur eye.
>
> > It was a very large shrub. My pic does not show the bulk of the shrub,
> > just a few bottom branches. See my 3rd pic for the base of the mother
> > plant.
>
> > I thought at the time it might be a shrubby honeysuckle. But the
> > stigma is not right.
>
> > Of all the unidentified plants from this trip this is THE one I would
> > really love to id.
> > I thought my close up pics showing the detail pretty well would make
> > it so easy! Not so!
>
> > Any further thoughts anyone?
>
> > Regards
> > Sheila.
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> > On Oct 30, 3:27 pm, Giby Kuriakose <giby.kuriak...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Please refer the following link as well
>
> > >http://www.biotik.org/india/species/l/lasiparv/lasiparv_11_en.html
>
> > > Regards
> > > Giby
>
> > > On 30 October 2011 16:23, Giby Kuriakose <giby.kuriak...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
>
> > > > FOC says ....style linear stigma lobes 3-9.
>
> > > >http://www.efloras.org/florataxon.aspx?flora_id=2&taxon_id=117649
>
> > > > Regards,
> > > > Giby
>
> > > > On 30 October 2011 09:26, shrikant ingalhalikar <le...@rediffmail.com
> > >wrote:
>
> > > >> Dear Vijaysankar ji, isn't style 3-5 branched for Lasianthus? Regards,
> > > >> Shrikant
>
> > > >> On Oct 22, 9:55 pm, Dinesh Valke <dinesh.va...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >> > Hi Sheila,
>
> > > >> > Very well first-executed post.
> > > >> > Only one point to bear in mind for the next query that you would
> > post.
> > > >> > The subject line needs to be unique (forgot to stress on this point
> > in
> > > >> my
> > > >> > invite to you).
> > > >> > Thus your next post may have such wording: <some relevant words>
> > > >> > DDMMYYSheila at <name of place plant sighted>
>
> > > >> > Happy querying and posting !!
>
> > > >> > Dear friends,
> > > >> > Sheila is my recent flickr contact. She had been to India as a
> > tourist
> > > >> and
> > > >> > has some plants that she would like to get identified.
> > > >> > She is a plain naturalist, has no botanical background.
>
> > > >> > Regards.
> > > >> > Dinesh
>
> > > >> > On Sat, Oct 22, 2011 at 9:45 PM, howard sadd <hj.s...@tiscali.co.uk
>
> > > >> wrote:
> > > >> > >  I hope I am doing this correctly. My first post here!
>
> > > >> > > Please can you identify this large rather straggly shrub.
> > > >> > > It was found along the road to Tiger Hill near Darjeeling.
> > > >> > > Many thanks.
>
> > > >> > > The message is ready to be sent with the following file or link
> > > >> > > attachments:
> > > >> > > 006 02-04-2011 09-12-44
> > > >> > > 006 02-04-2011 09-12-56
> > > >> > > 006 02-04-2011 09-13-48
> > > >> > > 006 02-04-2011 09-14-00
> > > >> > > 006 02-04-2011 09-14-14
> > > >> > > 006 02-04-2011 09-15-13
> > > >> > > 006 02-04-2011 09-15-52
> > > >> > > 006 05-05-2011 13-55-16
>
> > > >> > > Note: To protect against computer viruses, e-mail programs may
> > prevent
> > > >> > > sending or receiving certain types of file attachments. Check your
> > > >> e-mail
> > > >> > > security settings to determine how attachments are handled.- Hide
> > > >> quoted text -
>
> > > >> > - Show quoted text -
>
> > > > --
> > > > GIBY KURIAKOSE PhD
> > > > Ashoka Trust for Research in Ecology and the Environment (ATREE),
> > > > Royal Enclave,
> > > > Jakkur Post, Srirampura
> > > > Bangalore- 560064
> > > > India
> > > > Phone -+91 9448714856begin_of_the_skype_highlighting              +91
> > 9448714856      end_of_the_skype_highlighting(Mobile)
> > > > visit my pictures @http://www.flickr.com/photos/giby
>
> > > --
> > > GIBY KURIAKOSE PhD
> > > Ashoka Trust for Research in Ecology and the Environment (ATREE),
> > > Royal Enclave,
> > > Jakkur Post, Srirampura
> > > Bangalore- 560064
> > > India
> > > Phone -+91 9448714856begin_of_the_skype_highlighting              +91
> > 9448714856      end_of_the_skype_highlighting(Mobile)
> > > visit my pictures @http://www.flickr.com/photos/giby-Hide quoted text -
>
> > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

Reply via email to