Just to complete the discussion please try to answer my query too...
Why it is not I*ndigofera glandulosa*?

On Mon, Dec 26, 2011 at 2:44 PM, Gurcharan Singh <[email protected]> wrote:

> Thanks Vijayasankar ji again
>
>
> --
> Dr. Gurcharan Singh
> Retired  Associate Professor
> SGTB Khalsa College, University of Delhi, Delhi-110007
> Res: 932 Anand Kunj, Vikas Puri, New Delhi-110018.
> Phone: 011-25518297  Mob: 9810359089
> http://people.du.ac.in/~singhg45/
>
> On Mon, Dec 26, 2011 at 11:01 AM, Vijayasankar 
> <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>> I consider the posted plant as Indigofera trifoliata, mainly due to the
>> prominent wings. I. prostrata is a prostrate herb with very narrowly winged
>> pods. It is not I. trita for sure.
>>
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> Vijayasankar Raman
>> National Center for Natural Products Research
>> University of Mississippi
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Dec 24, 2011 at 8:30 AM, Gurcharan Singh <[email protected]>wrote:
>>
>>> I just came across the description in Herbaceous Flora of Dehradun  by C
>>> R Babu, adjacent to our Chakrata. He reports Indigofera prostrata from the
>>> area, a species that was treated under I. trifoliata in FBI and few other
>>> Floras, but as distinct species by Gamble, Babu and now The Plant list.
>>> According to Babu the two are differentiated as under:
>>>
>>> *Indigofera trifoliata: *perennial, stout stems, leaflets shallowly
>>> notched, stout; pod 8-10 mm long, 2 mm broad, 4-6 seeded; sutures winged,
>>> seeds as long as broad.
>>> *Indigofera prostrata:* annual, slender stems, leaflets obtuse
>>> mucronate, slender; pod 13-15 mm long, 1 mm broad, 8-9 seeded, faintly
>>> winged; seeds longer than broad.
>>>
>>> In above photographs leaves appear mucronate, but other things don't
>>> match I. prostrata they rather approach I. trifoliata.
>>> Your comments please.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Dr. Gurcharan Singh
>>> Retired  Associate Professor
>>> SGTB Khalsa College, University of Delhi, Delhi-110007
>>> Res: 932 Anand Kunj, Vikas Puri, New Delhi-110018.
>>> Phone: 011-25518297  Mob: 9810359089
>>> http://people.du.ac.in/~singhg45/
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sat, Dec 24, 2011 at 6:02 PM, Gurcharan Singh <[email protected]>wrote:
>>>
>>>> Dear H S
>>>> I did consider I. trita seriously but went for I. trifoliata because:
>>>> 1. the pods appear winged.
>>>> 2. under surface of leaf is gland-dotted
>>>> 3. according to eflora of Pakistan inflorescence may be up to 4.5 cm
>>>> long in I. trita, here it is sessile
>>>> 4. I trifoliata is reported from the area, not I. trita
>>>>
>>>> Enclosing some more close ups
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Dr. Gurcharan Singh
>>>> Retired  Associate Professor
>>>> SGTB Khalsa College, University of Delhi, Delhi-110007
>>>> Res: 932 Anand Kunj, Vikas Puri, New Delhi-110018.
>>>> Phone: 011-25518297  Mob: 9810359089
>>>> http://people.du.ac.in/~singhg45/
>>>>
>>>> On Sat, Dec 24, 2011 at 2:20 PM, H S <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Surely Indigofera, but to me it look more like I. trita
>>>>>
>>>>> regards,
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sat, Dec 24, 2011 at 2:41 AM, Vijayasankar <
>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks Gurcharan ji, for the nice words and also for the validation.
>>>>>> I agree with your id : I. trifoliata.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Vijayasankar Raman
>>>>>> National Center for Natural Products Research
>>>>>> University of Mississippi
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 5:58 AM, Gurcharan Singh 
>>>>>> <[email protected]>wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Vijayasankar ji, you are never wrong
>>>>>>> I never knew Indigofera has a few species with trifoliate leaves, so
>>>>>>> perhaps ignored the pod length.
>>>>>>> Yes it matches with Indigofera trifoliata L. with leaflets
>>>>>>> gland-dotted on under surface, racemes almost sessile, bright red 
>>>>>>> corolla ,
>>>>>>> bristle-like calyx teeth and pubescent deflexed pod with weak wings.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks a ton for this great lead.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Dr. Gurcharan Singh
>>>>>>> Retired  Associate Professor
>>>>>>> SGTB Khalsa College, University of Delhi, Delhi-110007
>>>>>>> Res: 932 Anand Kunj, Vikas Puri, New Delhi-110018.
>>>>>>> Phone: 011-25518297  Mob: 9810359089
>>>>>>> http://people.du.ac.in/~singhg45/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 3:31 PM, Vijayasankar <
>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Gurcharan ji,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Could this be an Indigofera species? I think pods of Lespedeza are
>>>>>>>> 1-seeded. I may be wrong though.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Vijayasankar Raman
>>>>>>>> National Center for Natural Products Research
>>>>>>>> University of Mississippi
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 11:58 PM, Gurcharan Singh <
>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Resurfacing again for Species ID
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>> Dr. Gurcharan Singh
>>>>>>>>> Retired  Associate Professor
>>>>>>>>> SGTB Khalsa College, University of Delhi, Delhi-110007
>>>>>>>>> Res: 932 Anand Kunj, Vikas Puri, New Delhi-110018.
>>>>>>>>> Phone: 011-25518297  Mob: 9810359089
>>>>>>>>> http://people.du.ac.in/~singhg45/
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>>>>>>>> From: Gurcharan Singh <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>>> Date: Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 7:48 PM
>>>>>>>>> Subject: Fabaceae-Faboideae (Papilionaceae) Week: Lespedeza sp.
>>>>>>>>> from Chakrata Tiger fall area
>>>>>>>>> To: efloraofindia <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Undershrub with robust trailing branches; leaves trifoliate up to
>>>>>>>>> 2.5 cm long, and red flowers in axillary clusters.
>>>>>>>>> Photographed from Chakrata Tiger fall road in September.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>> Dr. Gurcharan Singh
>>>>>>>>> Retired  Associate Professor
>>>>>>>>> SGTB Khalsa College, University of Delhi, Delhi-110007
>>>>>>>>> Res: 932 Anand Kunj, Vikas Puri, New Delhi-110018.
>>>>>>>>> Phone: 011-25518297  Mob: 9810359089
>>>>>>>>> http://people.du.ac.in/~singhg45/
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>>  - H.S.
>>>>>
>>>>> A scientific man ought to have no wishes, no affections, - a mere
>>>>> heart of stone
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
>


-- 
Dr Satish Phadke

Reply via email to