Kya baat hai Balkar Ji, Dhanyavad.
regards Pankaj Oudhia On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 8:07 PM, Balkar Singh <[email protected]> wrote: > ** > > > On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 7:58 PM, Pankaj Oudhia <[email protected]>wrote: > >> Going to health club for one hour Table Tennis. Will join the discussion >> after 10 P.M. >> >> regards >> >> Pankaj Oudhia >> >> >> On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 7:56 PM, Pankaj Oudhia <[email protected]>wrote: >> >>> And C. brachyphyllus Boiss. (1956) is syn. of C.scindicus Stocks (1852). >>> >>> >>> regards >>> >>> Pankaj Oudhia >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 7:52 PM, Gurcharan Singh <[email protected]>wrote: >>> >>>> Pankaj ji >>>> >>>> I am aware of that. In fact two people had used this name Convolvulus >>>> scindicus Stocks (1852) which is the correct names and Convolvulus >>>> scindicus Boiss. (1856) which is now a synonym of Convolvulus prostratus >>>> (syn: C. microphyllus; C. pluricaulis). >>>> >>>> The key is what plant Stapf named as Ipomoea sindica. >>>> >>>> Gurcharan Singh >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 7:40 PM, Pankaj Oudhia >>>> <[email protected]>wrote: >>>> >>>>> Gurcharan ji, >>>>> >>>>> Here is plant no.3 i.e. Convolvulus scindicus Stocks. Local name >>>>> :Kaland. >>>>> >>>>> :The plant though very closely related to C. microphyllus can easily >>>>> be distinguished from the latter by its erect rigid habit and hirsute >>>>> branches. >>>>> >>>>> Source: Bhandari sir's flora. >>>>> >>>>> He gifted me a copy of this flora after Ahmedabad meeting with his >>>>> signature and comment. It is valuable asset. >>>>> >>>>> So these are three different species. I am Agronomist by education not >>>>> Taxonomist but expecting from Taxonomists to publish one more >>>>> paper challenging the paper from Pakistan. >>>>> >>>>> regards >>>>> >>>>> Pankaj Oudhia >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 7:29 PM, Gurcharan Singh >>>>> <[email protected]>wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Let us hope it gets resolved soon: >>>>>> Three disctinct species Convolvulus scindicus, Ipomoea sindica (in >>>>>> this case Stapf should have given a description different from first >>>>>> species) and Ipomoea eriocarpa >>>>>> or only two species Convolvulus scindicus (syn: ipomoea sindica) and >>>>>> Ipomoea eriocarpa >>>>>> >>>>>> If any one can hold of original publication of Stapf, the problem can >>>>>> get solved. >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Dr. Gurcharan Singh >>>>>> Retired Associate Professor >>>>>> SGTB Khalsa College, University of Delhi, Delhi-110007 >>>>>> Res: 932 Anand Kunj, Vikas Puri, New Delhi-110018. >>>>>> Phone: 011-25518297 Mob: 9810359089 >>>>>> http://www.gurcharanfamily.com/ >>>>>> http://people.du.ac.in/~singhg45/ >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 7:20 PM, Pankaj Oudhia < >>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> At that time I was not having good camera like Dsc P-120 or at >>>>>>> present Sony HX-1. I can draw but not good artist like Pankaj Kumar >>>>>>> Sahani >>>>>>> ji. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I am confident that pictures must be in FRLHT's database. Also in >>>>>>> Bhandari sir's flora colored plates are there. Line diagrams are also >>>>>>> there. And foremost Bhandari sir is with us. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> regards >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Pankaj Oudhia >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 7:10 PM, Gurcharan Singh <[email protected] >>>>>>> > wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Pankaj ji >>>>>>>> It is good that you have seen all: Ipomoea sindica (if it different >>>>>>>> from Convolvulus scindicus), Ipomoea eriocarpa as also Convolvulus >>>>>>>> scindcus >>>>>>>> (since Convolvulus scindicus appears in one of your publications). If >>>>>>>> you >>>>>>>> could upload all (or provide links to their photographs) our problem >>>>>>>> would >>>>>>>> be solved. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>> Dr. Gurcharan Singh >>>>>>>> Retired Associate Professor >>>>>>>> SGTB Khalsa College, University of Delhi, Delhi-110007 >>>>>>>> Res: 932 Anand Kunj, Vikas Puri, New Delhi-110018. >>>>>>>> Phone: 011-25518297 Mob: 9810359089 >>>>>>>> http://www.gurcharanfamily.com/ >>>>>>>> http://people.du.ac.in/~singhg45/ >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 6:42 PM, Pankaj Oudhia < >>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Fortunately I have seen both species and discussed on it with >>>>>>>>> Bhandari sir. The occasion was the event by National Innovation >>>>>>>>> Foundation >>>>>>>>> and as Advisory Research Committee Members myself, Bhandari sir, >>>>>>>>> Dr.Darshan >>>>>>>>> Shankar of FRLHT and Dr. Puspagadan were discussing the entries of the >>>>>>>>> Traditional experts for award. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Ipomoea sindica is annual with 4 seeds. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Just to add >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Everything is not published, Everything is not in internet and >>>>>>>>> also Everything on internet is not authentic, PLUS every thing >>>>>>>>> published in >>>>>>>>> science journals are not ultimate. Science is dynamic not static. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Peer reviewed papers are seen by 10-15 reviewers but discussions >>>>>>>>> in Efloraindia are seen by thousands of reviewers up to many decades. >>>>>>>>> Hence, there is need to reconsider the "Peer-review mania" present in >>>>>>>>> few >>>>>>>>> researchers. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Lets wait for the comments of other members. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> regards >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Pankaj Oudhia >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 6:14 PM, Gurcharan Singh < >>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> yes Pankaj ji >>>>>>>>>> It is this Ipomoea sindica Stapf, which I had mentioned in my two >>>>>>>>>> communications and which according to Flora of Pakistan cited by me >>>>>>>>>> above >>>>>>>>>> is now correctly known as Convolvulus scindicus Stocks. Please >>>>>>>>>> Remember >>>>>>>>>> Stapf did not describe a new plant, he merely gave a combination >>>>>>>>>> Ipomoea >>>>>>>>>> sindica (dropping c). The species is now considered belonging to >>>>>>>>>> genus >>>>>>>>>> Convolvulus. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I don't have Flora of Indian Desert by M M Bhandari, but have >>>>>>>>>> hard copy of Flora of W Pakistan published in 1979, which also >>>>>>>>>> considers >>>>>>>>>> Ipomoea sindica (Stocks) Stapf as synonym of Convolvulus scindicus >>>>>>>>>> Stocks. >>>>>>>>>> Perhaps this comparison between Convolvulus scindicus and >>>>>>>>>> Ipomoea eriocarpa should help to resolve the issue >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Convolvulus >>>>>>>>>> scindicus >>>>>>>>>> Ipomoea >>>>>>>>>> eriocarpa >>>>>>>>>> 1. Shrub or >>>>>>>>>> undershrub 1. >>>>>>>>>> Plant a >>>>>>>>>> twinning herb or prostrate >>>>>>>>>> 2. Leaves 5-10 mm long, sessile, succulent. >>>>>>>>>> 2. Leaves 25-90 mm long, petiole almost as long as blade, not >>>>>>>>>> succulent >>>>>>>>>> 3. Leaf base not cordate at base, margin undulate. 3. >>>>>>>>>> Leaf cordate at base, margin not undulate. >>>>>>>>>> 4. Corolla c. 12 mm >>>>>>>>>> long. 4. Corolla 7-9 >>>>>>>>>> mm long. >>>>>>>>>> 5. Ovary (obviously capsule) >>>>>>>>>> glabrous. 5. Capsule pubescent >>>>>>>>>> 6. Seed >>>>>>>>>> one >>>>>>>>>> 6. >>>>>>>>>> Seeds more than one >>>>>>>>>> 7. Stigma >>>>>>>>>> filiform >>>>>>>>>> 7. >>>>>>>>>> Stigma globose >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Frankly I have not seen any of these two but my conclusions are >>>>>>>>>> based on published information. Perhaps you can go through the >>>>>>>>>> description >>>>>>>>>> given in Flora of Indian Desert to arrive at the conclusion of which >>>>>>>>>> is >>>>>>>>>> intended.If it matches the second, then perhaps some thing is wrong. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Gurcharan Singh >>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 5:27 PM, Pankaj Oudhia < >>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Ipomoea sindica Staph. in Kew Bull. 93; I.1894; Prain in Journ. >>>>>>>>>>> Asi.Soc. Beng. 65: pt.2. 537. 1896; FPB. 2:313; BH. 26(2); 546. >>>>>>>>>>> 1919 (Type >>>>>>>>>>> Stapf, CAL 311725) >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Source: The Flora of the Indian Desert, MM Bhandari, MPS Repros, >>>>>>>>>>> Jodhpur, India. Revised Edition 1990. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> regards >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Pankaj Oudhia >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 4:29 PM, Gurcharan Singh < >>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Pankaj ji >>>>>>>>>>>> I fail to understand your sudden outburst is directed against >>>>>>>>>>>> whom?, we had long forgotten such things and luckily our present >>>>>>>>>>>> group >>>>>>>>>>>> believes on facts evidenced by literature references and not >>>>>>>>>>>> personal >>>>>>>>>>>> preferences. >>>>>>>>>>>> I request you to Google search for Ipomoea sindica to know >>>>>>>>>>>> the facts. Also go through the following links to decide for >>>>>>>>>>>> yourself: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> http://efloras.org/browse.aspx?flora_id=0&name_str=Ipomoea+sindica&btnSearch=Search >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> http://efloras.org/florataxon.aspx?flora_id=5&taxon_id=250096915 >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> http://efloras.org/florataxon.aspx?flora_id=5&taxon_id=200018847 >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> http://plants.jstor.org/flora/fwta6445 >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> http://ecoport.org/ep?SearchType=reference&ReferenceID=216502 >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> I would be happy to know if Ipomoea sindica really exists. >>>>>>>>>>>> Could you kindly give the full reference and author associated >>>>>>>>>>>> with the >>>>>>>>>>>> name and taxonomic resource. >>>>>>>>>>>> . >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>> Dr. Gurcharan Singh >>>>>>>>>>>> Retired Associate Professor >>>>>>>>>>>> SGTB Khalsa College, University of Delhi, Delhi-110007 >>>>>>>>>>>> Res: 932 Anand Kunj, Vikas Puri, New Delhi-110018. >>>>>>>>>>>> Phone: 011-25518297 Mob: 9810359089 >>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.gurcharanfamily.com/ >>>>>>>>>>>> http://people.du.ac.in/~singhg45/ >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> * * >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 1:00 PM, Pankaj Oudhia < >>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Just consulted FRLHT database where both species are dealt >>>>>>>>>>>>> separately. May be Vijayashankar ji can throw more light on it. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> http://envis.frlht.org/bot_search.php >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> regards >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Pankaj Oudhia >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 12:25 PM, Pankaj Oudhia < >>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Capsule Glabrous; seeds glabrous - Ipomoea sindica >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Capsule hispid; seeds glabrous - Ipomoea eriocarpa >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ipomoea eriocarpa syn. Ipomoea hispida, Convolvulus hispidus. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> This is one of the very early flowering plants; when it is >>>>>>>>>>>>>> only 2-3 leaved, it bears flowers. It is more common than >>>>>>>>>>>>>> closely related >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ipomoea eriocarpa R.Br. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> -From Field Notes of Bhandari sir. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Unfortunately our group is hijacked by single minded expert >>>>>>>>>>>>>> not ready to consider others. It is harmful to both group and >>>>>>>>>>>>>> science of >>>>>>>>>>>>>> taxonomy. We must know that it is not the classroom. This >>>>>>>>>>>>>> attitude of >>>>>>>>>>>>>> dominance is forcing lots of members to keep distance with the >>>>>>>>>>>>>> group. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Bhandari sir is with us and we can invite him to the group >>>>>>>>>>>>>> anytime for clarification. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> regards >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Pankaj Oudhia >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 11:59 AM, Tabish >>>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]>wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Dear Gurcharan ji, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sorry, I had missed your earlier post. Thanks for the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> explanation. I was indeed unaware of Convolvolvulus scindicus >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Stocks. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best wishes >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Tabish >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wednesday, March 28, 2012 3:36:19 PM UTC+5:30, Gurcharan >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Singh wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Tabish ji >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Not the real Ipomoea sindica Satpf. which is now correctly >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> known as Convolvolvulus scindicus Stocks >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The Ipomoea sindica wrongly identified by Jafri in Flora of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Karachi and several authors is Ipomoea eriocarpa as explained >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> by me above. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Dr. Gurcharan Singh >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Retired Associate Professor >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> SGTB Khalsa College, University of Delhi, Delhi-110007 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Res: 932 Anand Kunj, Vikas Puri, New Delhi-110018. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Phone: 011-25518297 Mob: 9810359089 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.gurcharanfamily.**com/<http://www.gurcharanfamily.com/> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://people.du.ac.in/~**singhg45/<http://people.du.ac.in/~singhg45/> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 1:25 PM, Pankaj Oudhia < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks Tabish ji. In Flora of the Indian Desert by >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Dr.M.M.Bhandari, Ipomoea sindica is treated as entirely >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> different species >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to Ipomoea eriocarpa. Line diagrams of both species are there >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and it is >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mentioned that Ipomoea sindica is endemic to Sindh and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Rajasthan whereas >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ipomoea eriocarpa is present throughout India and also >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> reported in other >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> countries. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Just to add -Indian Traditional Healers specially from >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Rajasthan treat both species as different species as far as >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> medicinal >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> properties are concerned. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> regards >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Pankaj Oudhia >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 1:14 PM, Tabish <[email protected] >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The plant which was called Ipomoea sindica, is now known >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> **<http://www.efloras.org/florataxon.aspx?flora_id=5&taxon_id=200018847>Ipomoea >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> eriocarpa. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.efloras.org/**florataxon.aspx?flora_id=5&** >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> taxon_id=250096917<http://www.efloras.org/florataxon.aspx?flora_id=5&taxon_id=250096917> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.flowersofindia.**net/catalog/slides/Tiny%** >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 20Morning%20Glory.html<http://www.flowersofindia.net/catalog/slides/Tiny%20Morning%20Glory.html> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Tabish >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ------------------------------**------------- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> www.flowersofindia.net >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The waterhole of flower lovers >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, Mar 25, 2012 at 12:38 PM, jmgarg1 < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi, Balkar ji, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Didn't find any species named Ipomoea sindica on google >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> search. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Pl. check & let us know. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 24 September 2010 06:49, Balkar Arya < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Dear All >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ipomoea sindica >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (Pls correct me if i am wrong) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Dr Balkar Singh >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Head, Deptt. of Botany and Biotechnology >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Arya P G College, Panipat >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Haryana-132103 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 09416262964 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Dr Balkar Singh >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Head, Deptt. of Botany and Biotechnology >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Arya P G College, Panipat >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Haryana-132103 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 09416262964 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> With regards, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> J.M.Garg ([email protected]) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/**User:Jmgarg1<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Jmgarg1> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 'Creating awareness of Indian Flora & Fauna' >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The whole world uses my Image Resource of more than a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *thousand >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> species* & eight thousand images of Birds, Butterflies, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Plants etc. (arranged alphabetically & place-wise): >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://commons.wikimedia.org/**wiki/Category:J.M.Garg<http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:J.M.Garg>. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> can also use them for free as per Creative Commons >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> license attached with each image. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For identification, learning, discussion & >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> documentation of Indian Flora, please visit/ join our >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Efloraofindia Google >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> e-group: http://groups.google.co.in/** >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> group/indiantreepix<http://groups.google.co.in/group/indiantreepix>(more >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> than 1820 members & 1,10,000 messages on 29/2/12) or >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Efloraofindia >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> website: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://sites.google.com/site/**efloraofindia/<https://sites.google.com/site/efloraofindia/> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (with >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a species database of more than 6000 species). >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Also author of 'A Photoguide to the Birds of Kolkata & >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Common Birds of India'. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> x >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Dr. Gurcharan Singh >>>> Retired Associate Professor >>>> SGTB Khalsa College, University of Delhi, Delhi-110007 >>>> Res: 932 Anand Kunj, Vikas Puri, New Delhi-110018. >>>> Phone: 011-25518297 Mob: 9810359089 >>>> http://www.gurcharanfamily.com/ >>>> http://people.du.ac.in/~singhg45/ >>>> >>>> >>> >> > > > -- > Regards > > Dr Balkar Singh > Head, Deptt. of Botany and Biotechnology > Arya P G College, Panipat > Haryana-132103 > 09416262964 >
