Dear all,

This is *Commelina forskailii *Hochst. ex C. B. Clarke.. for sure.
Thank you

On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 2:08 PM, jmgarg1 <[email protected]> wrote:

> Forwarding again for Id confirmation or otherwise please.
>
> Some earlier relevant feedback:
>
> “For me it *looks like Commelina  forskaolii* though keeping in mind the
> difference .... I am really confused
>
> Is it a hybrid (natural hybrid)?
>
> Tanay”
>
>
>
> “Sir this is very confusing Genus. you seems to be right in *C forskaolii*”
> from Balkar ji.
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Gurcharan Singh <[email protected]>
> Date: 20 October 2011 19:59
> Subject: [efloraofindia:88744] 20102011GS1 Comelina from Delhi for ID
> To: efloraofindia <[email protected]>
>
>
> This plant has been lying in my folders for now more than two years. Under
> normal circumstances I would have identified it as C. forskaolii Vahl, a
> species which has been commonly reported from the area (Old Delhi Ridge)
> and lot of cytotaxonomic work done by workers as Delhi University. However,
> I could not ignore three clear differences that I noted in this plant:
> plants are erect;there seem to be auricles at the base of the leaf blade
> and the leaves are almost linear-lanceolate. These features take me to C.
> erecta  L., although not reported from the area. The only feature that is
> preventing me to call it C. erecta is proximal petal which appears bluish.
> Incidentally both the species are described and keyed in Flora of North
> America with the differences:
>
> Leaf-sheath with auricles at summit; Proximal petal minute, white; locules
> all one seeded; plants erect; leaves linear to lanceolate.........C. erecta
>
> Leaf-sheath not auricled; proximal petal blue, lilac or lavender; some
> locules 2-seeded; plants decumbent to ascending;
>  leaves oblong to lanceolate-oblong to
> elliptic-oblong........................................................................................................................C.
> forskaolii
>
> I am uploading different parts of plant including fruits. Kindly give your
> opinion.
>
>
> --
> Dr. Gurcharan Singh
> Retired  Associate Professor
> SGTB Khalsa College, University of Delhi, Delhi-110007
> Res: 932 Anand Kunj, Vikas Puri, New Delhi-110018.
> Phone: 011-25518297  Mob: 9810359089
> http://people.du.ac.in/~singhg45/
>
>
>
>
> --
> With regards,
> J.M.Garg
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Jmgarg1
> 'Creating awareness of Indian Flora & Fauna'
> The whole world uses my Image Resource of more than a *thousand species*& 
> eight thousand images of Birds, Butterflies, Plants etc. (arranged
> alphabetically & place-wise):
> http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:J.M.Garg. You can also use
> them for free as per Creative Commons license attached with each image.
> For identification, learning, discussion & documentation of Indian Flora,
> please visit/ join our Efloraofindia Google e-group:
> http://groups.google.co.in/group/indiantreepix (more than 1840 members &
> 1,10,000 messages on 31/3/12) or Efloraofindia website:
> https://sites.google.com/site/efloraofindia/ (with a species database
> of more than 6500 species).
> Also author of 'A Photoguide to the Birds of Kolkata & Common Birds of
> India'.
>
>


-- 
Mayur Nandikar
Research Student,
Department of Botany,
Shivaji University, Kolhapur (MS)
India- 416 004
+917507013607
http://commelinaceae.blogspot.com
http://murdannia.blogspot.com
http://www.flickr.com/photos/commelinaceae

Reply via email to