Vijaysankar ji, Please apply FoC keys and let us know the possible answer(s). I have applied FoC keys and another (and with available information in posted images plus from my own collection) I keep coming back to W. pubescens despite of the fact that it has so far not been reported from our region.
Regards, Samir Mehta P.S.: found this thread after considerable effort this time. On Monday, May 14, 2012 7:44:37 PM UTC+5:30, Samir Mehta wrote: > > Firstly Vijaysankar ji, I stand corrected on Wrightia pubescens > distribution. > > It is not reported from Maharashtra (confirmed by Shrikant Ingalhalikar) > and not mentioned in Flora Maharashtra by M.R. Almeida. > > I also agree with your observation on corollary corona looking distinctly > different. > > Will have to wait a little while longer for the matter to resolve. > > Regards, > > Samir Mehta > > > > > On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 11:27 PM, Vijayasankar > <[email protected]>wrote: > >> Thanks Samir ji for the responses. >> Even though the leaves in the posted pictures are resembling that of >> Wrightia pubescens, the corollary corona as well as the petals are somewhat >> (rather clearly) differ from the ones in the following links. And I don't >> think it can be a variation: >> http://www.biotik.org/laos/species/w/wripu/wripu_en.html >> http://www.flickr.com/photos/53395767@N03/5543230704 >> >> Let's re-search further... >> >> Regards >> >> Vijayasankar Raman >> National Center for Natural Products Research >> University of Mississippi >> >> >> >> On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 7:23 AM, Samir Mehta <[email protected]>wrote: >> >>> This is Wrightia pubescens. >>> >>> Please refer to Vijaysankar ji's observations above (corona longer than >>> anthers) and the leaves are also pubescent but this characteristic is not >>> well seen in these images. >>> >>> Vijaysankar ji, we have W. pubescens in Mahaharashtra. >>> >>> Regards, >>> >>> Samir Mehta >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Tuesday, November 8, 2011 6:06:49 PM UTC+5:30, Samir Mehta wrote: >>>> >>>> Please see my post >>>> >>>> https://groups.google.com/**group/indiantreepix/browse_**thread/thread/ >>>> **f4536a999b4ad4d8/**c1fe27f4c7bf0ad9?hl=en&lnk=** >>>> gst&q=Wrightia+arborea#**c1fe27f4c7bf0ad9<https://groups.google.com/group/indiantreepix/browse_thread/thread/f4536a999b4ad4d8/c1fe27f4c7bf0ad9?hl=en&lnk=gst&q=Wrightia+arborea#c1fe27f4c7bf0ad9> >>>> >>>> >>>> for W. arborea. >>>> >>>> Need time to comment on the images in this thread but they are not >>>> W.arborea. >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> >>>> Samir Mehta >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Nov 8, 11:01 am, Pravir Deshmukh <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> > Dear all its a *Wrightia arborea * >>>> > >>>> > Thanks for the correct id >>>> > >>>> > -- >>>> > Pravir Deshmukh >>>> > 09717611977 >>> >>> >> >
