Good morning Pankaj Ji Thank you so dearly for providing me the link of Ganesh Ji's reply. I think the content is same as in https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups#!topic/indiantreepix/pW4Kpmc7KAw . Ganesh Ji identified the species as *H. roseum*, not *H. vittatum* !!!
Moreover, i copy here my earlier reply to Garg Sir that can be found in this very post - *"Thank you Garg Sir, for resurfacing the post. I think this species is Hippeastrum roseum as has been suggested by Ganesh Ji in another post - https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups#!topic/indiantreepix/pW4Kpmc7KAw * *Regards,* *Surajit Koley"* Furthermore, the following link indicates that what are known as *H. roseum* are actually *H. puniceum.* Please see - http://www.pacificbulbsociety.org/pbslist/2011-September/174k90a79nc5oim3j5t88rfqa3.html The same has been suggested by Samir Ji. So, what i should go for? *H. roseum*? *H.puniceum*? *H. vittatum*? Or do i take all for synonyms? Again, what might be the explanation of longer anther size in https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups#!searchin/indiantreepix/lycoris/indiantreepix/pW4Kpmc7KAw/YbdfrsfHToYJ ? Regards, Surajit Koley On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 6:25 AM, Pankaj Kumar <[email protected]>wrote: > > https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups#!searchin/indiantreepix/lycoris/indiantreepix/pW4Kpmc7KAw/YbdfrsfHToYJ > > This link. Mr Ganesh Mani Pradhan is too humble to write that, but > infact he is a well known figure and a very famous horticulturist and > orchid expert :). > Pankaj > > > On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 11:58 PM, surajit koley > <[email protected]> wrote: > > Dear Pankaj Ji, > > > > I fail to find any link related to Ganesh Ji's reply. If it is in future > > certainly will keep a tab. > > > > Regards, > > > > surajit > > > > > > > > On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 2:01 PM, Pankaj Kumar <[email protected]> > > wrote: > >> > >> I have no doubts about your abilities so cheer up. > >> Check this link for reply from Mr. Ganesh Mani pradhan. > >> Pankaj > >> > >> > >> > >> On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 3:46 PM, surajit koley > >> <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > Dear Pankaj Ji, > >> > > >> > I am very nervous relating to anything on education. Barring a few > >> > exception, i don't even know the local names of flora or fauna > species, > >> > only > >> > acquired some bookish knowledge, that too very little. > >> > > >> > And i admitted/confessed the above many a times, including the time of > >> > joining in each group :- > >> > > >> > > >> > 1) > https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en&fromgroups#!search/authormsg:indiantreepix,VFAk1L4zJmkJ$20after:2011$2F12$2F1$20before:2012$2F1$2F1|sort:date/butterfly_india/VuAM9fLBvac/lad484XXO90J > >> > > >> > 2) > https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en&fromgroups#!search/authormsg:indiantreepix,VFAk1L4zJmkJ$20after:2011$2F12$2F1$20before:2012$2F1$2F1|sort:date/dragonflyindia/f4K2Jbl3brw/HB1cjIfvtuUJ > >> > > >> > 3) > https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en&fromgroups#!search/authormsg:indiantreepix,VFAk1L4zJmkJ$20after:2011$2F12$2F1$20before:2012$2F1$2F1|sort:date/indiantreepix/ZWbAS7c3c5o/YYvzrc5LQxgJ > >> > > >> > I have never claimed that i know something on anything. Even then if > any > >> > of > >> > my messages bears the slightest hints of my self-esteem i apologize > >> > before > >> > all. > >> > > >> > So. how am i supposed to know if the concerned species is H. > vittatum of > >> > not? > >> > > >> > Regards, > >> > > >> > Surajit Koley > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 8:38 AM, Dr Pankaj Kumar > >> > <[email protected]> > >> > wrote: > >> >> > >> >> Why your plant doesnt look like Hippeastrum vittatum? > >> >> Pankaj > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> On Tuesday, 8 May 2012 15:29:45 UTC+8, surajit koley wrote: > >> >>> > >> >>> Sir / Madam, > >> >>> > >> >>> Attaching some photographs that i have recorded a couple of hours > ago. > >> >>> Please read it along with my earlier post at > >> >>> > >> >>> - > https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups#!topic/indiantreepix/pW4Kpmc7KAw > . > >> >>> > >> >>> Species : UNKNOWN > >> >>> Habit & Habitat : wild herb, uncultivated area in mango orchard > >> >>> Date : 08-05-12, 09.04 a.m. > >> >>> Place : Nalikul (Hooghly), WB > >> >>> > >> >>> I have noted the following differences between the two species - > >> >>> > >> >>> 1) Marked difference in anther size and colour : this species has > >> >>> smaller > >> >>> anther and pollens are yellow > >> >>> 2) Difference in scape height : the height os the scape of this one > is > >> >>> about 60 cm, while the scape is more than 70 cm > >> >>> > >> >>> in > https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups#!topic/indiantreepix/pW4Kpmc7KAw > >> >>> 3) No differences in flower size or scape diameter > >> >>> 4) No visible difference in colour > >> >>> > >> >>> Thank you & Regards, > >> >>> > >> >>> Surajit Koley > >> > > >> > > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> ********************************************************************** > >> "Taxonomists getting Extinct and Species Data Deficient !!" > >> > >> > >> Pankaj Kumar, Ph.D. > >> Conservation Officer > >> > >> Office: > >> Orchid Conservation Section > >> Flora Conservation Department > >> Kadoorie Farm and Botanic Garden (KFBG) Corporation > >> Lam Kam Road, Tai Po, New Territories, Hong Kong. > >> > >> Residence: > >> 36C, Ng Tung Chai, Lam Tseun > >> Tai Po, New Territories, Hong Kong. > >> > >> email: [email protected]; [email protected]; > >> [email protected] > >> Phone: +852 2483 7128 (office - 8:30am to 5:00pm); +852 9436 6251 > >> (mobile). Fax: +852 2483 7194 > > > > > > > > -- > ********************************************************************** > "Taxonomists getting Extinct and Species Data Deficient !!" > > > Pankaj Kumar, Ph.D. > Conservation Officer > > Office: > Orchid Conservation Section > Flora Conservation Department > Kadoorie Farm and Botanic Garden (KFBG) Corporation > Lam Kam Road, Tai Po, New Territories, Hong Kong. > > Residence: > 36C, Ng Tung Chai, Lam Tseun > Tai Po, New Territories, Hong Kong. > > email: [email protected]; [email protected]; > [email protected] > Phone: +852 2483 7128 (office - 8:30am to 5:00pm); +852 9436 6251 > (mobile). Fax: +852 2483 7194 >
