Yes, this doesn't seem to be Ehretia laevis because the fruits are not 2-lobed. Likely to be Ehretia aspera. Great clear photos.
regards, Radha Veach On Wednesday, June 6, 2012 9:08:03 PM UTC+5:30, Satish Phadke wrote: > > Very nice crisp photographs. > The leaves do not appear glabrous. I think this is *Ehretia aspera*. Let > us wait for opinion of others. > > On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 11:16 AM, ushadi Micromini < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> what a nice complete set of pictures >> usha di >> = >> >> >> On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 8:58 AM, Nidhan Singh <[email protected]>wrote: >> >>> Dear All, >>> >>> This is *Ehretia laevis** Roxb., Pl. Corom. 1: 42, t. 56, 1795*; >>> Collett, Fl. Simlensis 330. >>> >>> A moderate-sized, deciduous tree with smooth, grey bark. Leaves 7-14 cm >>> long, elliptic, obtuse or acuminate, entire, membraneous when young, hard >>> when mature. Flowers white, small, in terminal or axillary, slender, >>> usually one-sided cymes. Calyx 5-cleft. Corolla-tube 2.5 cm long, petals 5, >>> spreading. Stamens 5. Fruit a 0.5 cm across drupe, globose, depressed, >>> red. >>> >>> -- >>> Regards, >>> >>> Dr. Nidhan Singh >>> Department of Botany >>> I.B. (PG) College >>> Panipat-132103 Haryana >>> Ph.: 09416371227 >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> Usha di >> =========== >> >> > > > -- > Dr Satish Phadke >
