Thank you,Gurcharanji,  these berries are different looking...
these are separate, the bunch seems pointing towards the earth...
as opposed to the poison sumac berry bunches seen in north america...
not sure if it occurs in SF where you are right ow but if you go to the
mountains or into oregon I have seen them... since they are weeds never
took time to  really photograph them... but being  a keen botanist I am
sure you'll spot them... very soon the leaves would change colors too...
their berries individually are quite small... but tightly packed.. almost
as tightly as millet or jowar is packed...

still with the difference in berries... the leaves /twigs/juice behaved
like a rhus anyway... family of allergenic plants...  Lesson to learn. I
did. Thanks
Usha di
--



On Sat, Aug 11, 2012 at 7:41 AM, Gurcharan Singh <[email protected]> wrote:

> Ushadi
> Luckily I have some photographs of drupe (not ripe though) taken last year
> on July 30. This year I photographed flowers in May.
>    I am uploading the photographs of drupes.
>
>
> --
> Dr. Gurcharan Singh
> Retired  Associate Professor
> SGTB Khalsa College, University of Delhi, Delhi-110007
> Res: 932 Anand Kunj, Vikas Puri, New Delhi-110018.
> Phone: 011-25518297  Mob: 9810359089
> http://www.gurcharanfamily.com/
> http://people.du.ac.in/~singhg45/
>
>
> On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 4:45 PM, ushadi Micromini <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Yes, this is Sumac.. Thnaks for the flower picture , I never went too
>> near to look this closely, Hope you wer safe distance this time around.
>>
>> colloquially called Poison sumac... name implies stay away from its sap
>> or the "oil" on the surface of the leaves...just like POiSON IVY and POISON
>> OAK"  in north america, grows in road sides where the disturbed soil is ...
>>
>> Usually all  SUMACs do not grow as majestically tall or wide as the
>> Ailanthus altissima... so once they are fully grown they can be
>> distuinguished... and the sumac leaves  also turn red before falling off in
>> winter.
>>
>> DID you ever get to photograph their berries?
>>
>> USha di
>>
>> On Sat, Aug 11, 2012 at 12:55 AM, Gurcharan Singh <[email protected]>wrote:
>>
>>> *Rhus succedanea* var. *himalaica* Hook.f., Fl. Brit. Ind. 2:12. 1876.
>>>
>>> Tree can be confused with Ailanthus altissima also growing commonly in
>>> Kashmir valley, but can be differentiated by much thinner totally entire
>>> glabrous leaves (somewhat thicker, serrate and hairy beneath in A.
>>> altissima), smaller flower and fruit being a small  up to 1 cm long drupe
>>> (3-5 cm long samara in A. altissima).  Deciduous tree with glabrous
>>> branches; leaves up to 50 cm long, imparipinnate with 9-13 leaflets,
>>> menbranous; flowers pale yellowish-white, in pubescent panicles shorter
>>> than leaves; calyx lobes ovate-obtuse; petals pale yellowish-green; styles
>>> 3; fruit a drupe up to 8 mm broad, slightly longer, yellowish brown.
>>>
>>> I was first introduced to this tree back in 1971 when returning after a
>>> collection trip to Dachhigam sanctuary (my research area) I rushed to a
>>> doctor with lots of itching and blisters on my arms and hands. Doctor asked
>>> me if I had touched some new plant, and I got the answer. Juice of this
>>> plant (cut twigs in my case) can cause skin irritation.
>>>     Photographed from Dachhigam, Kashmir.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Dr. Gurcharan Singh
>>> Retired  Associate Professor
>>> SGTB Khalsa College, University of Delhi, Delhi-110007
>>> Res: 932 Anand Kunj, Vikas Puri, New Delhi-110018.
>>> Phone: 011-25518297  Mob: 9810359089
>>> http://www.gurcharanfamily.com/
>>> http://people.du.ac.in/~singhg45/
>>>
>>>  --
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Usha di
>> ===========
>>
>>
>
>
>


-- 
Usha di
===========

-- 



Reply via email to