I think yes, Satish ji is right https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups#!searchin/indiantreepix/Wikstroemia/indiantreepix/zoegz6yKmZc/w-AAMDvxK7AJ%5B1-25%5D
-- Dr. Gurcharan Singh Retired Associate Professor SGTB Khalsa College, University of Delhi, Delhi-110007 Res: 932 Anand Kunj, Vikas Puri, New Delhi-110018. Phone: 011-25518297 Mob: 9810359089 http://www.gurcharanfamily.com/ http://people.du.ac.in/~singhg45/ On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 7:24 AM, Satish Phadke <[email protected]> wrote: > Can it be *Wikstroemia canescens*? > Dr Satish Phadke > > > > On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 8:28 PM, Dinesh Valke <[email protected]>wrote: > >> [image: Himalayan >> Goral]<http://www.google.com/url?q=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.flickr.com%2Fphotos%2Fdinesh_valke%2F7765095172%2F&sa=D&sntz=1&usg=AFrqEzeTm5FjINdNYmuY0Ito-eYpVUgZcg> >> 31 >> JUL 12 >> NH58 ... near Tangani, about 4500 ft >> ------------------------------ >> Dear friends, ID please. >> *Habitat*: along NH58 near Tangani >> *Habit*: diffuse shrub >> >> [image: >> P1000186]<http://www.google.com/url?q=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.flickr.com%2Fphotos%2Fdinesh_valke%2F7760152534%2F&sa=D&sntz=1&usg=AFrqEzdgT02wpWO8NYFn4Agg3YH-ie3e_g> >> >> [image: >> P1000188]<http://www.google.com/url?q=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.flickr.com%2Fphotos%2Fdinesh_valke%2F7760143926%2F&sa=D&sntz=1&usg=AFrqEzcn-BlmTOc7ybD3xMUrclzQJmI0Jw> >> [image: >> P1000191]<http://www.google.com/url?q=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.flickr.com%2Fphotos%2Fdinesh_valke%2F7760150742%2F&sa=D&sntz=1&usg=AFrqEzeiduHszjrW2kGyIdDVeK84MFuTqQ> >> Regards. >> Dinesh >> >> -- >> >> >> >> > > -- > > > > --
