Thanks Tabish ji for this useful paper. -- Dr. Gurcharan Singh Retired Associate Professor SGTB Khalsa College, University of Delhi, Delhi-110007 Res: 932 Anand Kunj, Vikas Puri, New Delhi-110018. Phone: 011-25518297 Mob: 9810359089 http://www.gurcharanfamily.com/ http://people.du.ac.in/~singhg45/
On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 1:09 PM, Tabish <[email protected]> wrote: > The Himalayan *Angelica* seems to have gone through a churning, a > samudra-manthan!* > *According to this paper of 2002, this Angelica species should be called > *Angelica > oreadum* (DIELS) M.HIROE (or Angelica oreada): > --------------------------- > *Angelica oreadum (DIELS) M.HIROE, Umbell. World: 1430 (1979) (“oreada”) > { Archangelica oreadum DIELS in Notizbl. Bot. Gart. Berlin 14:353 (1939)* > = Archangelica officinalis (MOENCH) HOFFM. var. himalaica C.B.CLARKE in > HOOK. f. Fl. Brit. Ind. 2: 707 (1879), p.p. { Angelica archangelica L. var. > himalaica (C.B.CLARKE) KRISHNA & BADHWAR in J. Sci. Ind. Res. 11: 251 > (1952); NASIR in > Fl. West Pakist. 20: 126 (1972). {L.f.Angelica archangelica himalaica (C. > B. CLARKE) WEINERT in Feddes Repert. 84 (4): 310 (1973). { Angelica > archangelica L. subsp. himalaica (C.B.CLARKE) G. SINGH in Forest Fl. > Srinagar: 183 (1976); G. SINGH & G.M. OZA in Bull. Bot. Surv. India 16 > (14): 168 (1977, “1974”). > ----------------------------- > I am attaching the paper. > - Tabish > > -- > > > > --
