Good morning Vijayasankar Ji,

I thought my species looked somewhat similar to the illustration available
at FoC - http://www.efloras.org/object_page.aspx?object_id=1393&flora_id=2,
and description available at - http://envis.frlht.org/plongum.htm informs
male spike is 2-7 cm long.

Thank you very much for the feedback.

Regards,

surajit



On Sat, Sep 22, 2012 at 2:55 AM, Vijayasankar <[email protected]>wrote:

> Good morning Surajit ji,
>
> This looks like a male plant of *Piper longum*. The male spikes are about
> 5 cm long and 3 mm in diameter (female spikes are shorter and stouter).
> Otherwise it may be a different species.
> The picture with leafy plant at wiki page, is not of Piper longum.
>
> Regards
>
> Vijayasankar Raman
> National Center for Natural Products Research
> University of Mississippi
>
>
> On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 12:55 PM, surajit koley <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Sir,
>>
>> Internet is very confusing source of info, well, sometimes.
>> A search for *Piper longum* L. gives plant pictures of distinctly
>> variable leaf venation, even scanned herbarium images available in the net
>> can be confusing too. Two such example :-
>>
>>    1. http://www.rprcbbsr.com/herbarium/herbarium/images/id/658
>>    2. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Long_pepper
>>
>> On the other hand, images found some other sites do comply with my
>> species :-
>>
>>    1. http://linnaeus.nrm.se/botany/fbo/p/piper/pipelon.html.en
>>    2.
>>    
>> http://ww2.bgbm.org/herbarium/view_large.cfm?SpecimenPK=103131&idThumb=313215&SpecimenSequenz=1&loan=1
>>
>> Description and images at :-
>>
>>    1. http://envis.frlht.org/plongum.htm
>>    2.
>>    http://www.efloras.org/florataxon.aspx?flora_id=2&taxon_id=200005574
>>    3. http://www.himalayahealthcare.com/herbfinder/h_piperl.htm
>>
>> Species : *Piper longum* L.
>> Bengali Name : PIPUL
>> Habit & Habitat : wild slender creeper, growing under very dense
>> vegetation of, i think, *Mikania micrantha* Kunth.
>> Date : 21/9/12, 4.02 p.m.
>> Place : Garalgacha (Hooghly)
>>
>> I am sorry that my camera is a dumb under low light.
>>
>> Thank you & Regards,
>>
>> surajit
>>
>>  --
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>

-- 



Reply via email to