I am glad you two agree... Nikon glass is much superior and working much better... for botany and close ups... why carry around a heavy 70-300... better to buy a single 100 mm macro Nikon.. get superb pictures all the time... and the 100mm will work as a 133 mm lens so will also double as a short tele and as a portrait lens...
If I were you I would go to flickr and look at pics taken by tamron 70-300 (search in flickr will get you all you want to see) and similar search for 70-300 nikon , and nikon 100 mm macro... etc.. I would also find people who own them or go to store take mycamera and try out the lenses before buying... hope this helps Usha di On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 11:25 AM, Ritesh Kumar Choudhary < [email protected]> wrote: > Dear Sir, > > I've tried Tamaron once......not very satisfied with its result. > > Nikon is far better than Tamaron. > > Regards, > Ritesh. > > > On Sunday, September 16, 2012 3:45:29 PM UTC+9, Balkar wrote: >> >> Dear All >> I shall be highly thankfull if you suggest one out of the following >> options >> *1. Tamron AF 70-300mm F/4-5.6 Di LD Macro (for Nikon Digital SLR) Lens * >> *2. Nikon AF Zoom-Nikkor 70-300mm f/4-5.6G (4.3x) Lens (Telephoto Zoom >> Lens) * >> *3. Any other in range of 10000 Rs* >> *Thanks >> * >> >> -- >> Regards >> >> Dr Balkar Singh >> Head, Deptt. of Botany and Biotechnology >> Arya P G College, Panipat >> Haryana-132103 >> 09416262964 >> > -- > > > > -- Usha di =========== --
