Well said Satish ji and Gurcharan ji... 'Character photography' is the way to go...
Regards Vijayasankar Raman National Center for Natural Products Research University of Mississippi On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 10:25 AM, Gurcharan Singh <[email protected]>wrote: > Thanks Satish ji > efloraofindia will benefit the most if more and more members understand > the value of character photography (as you have termed it). It would be > much more easier for those trying to identify. Perhaps we have to abandon > the concept of "flower alone is enough". > > > -- > Dr. Gurcharan Singh > Retired Associate Professor > SGTB Khalsa College, University of Delhi, Delhi-110007 > Res: 932 Anand Kunj, Vikas Puri, New Delhi-110018. > Phone: 011-25518297 Mob: 9810359089 > http://www.gurcharanfamily.com/ > http://people.du.ac.in/~singhg45/ > > > On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 7:05 AM, Satish Phadke <[email protected]>wrote: > >> Flower hopefully 1-1.5 cm; Perianth segments unequal. Pedicels stout(Not >> filiform); Filaments not adnate wholly to perianth tube. Bracts much longer >> than pedicels. Bracts long acuminate scarious( Not coriaceous) >> Clearly Dipcadi ursulae. >> Very good character photography! Excellent. >> I like to use this term here as *Character photography* >> Dr Satish Phadke >> >> >> >> On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 11:50 PM, Prashant Awale <[email protected]>wrote: >> >>> Dear Friends, >>> >>> Is this *Dipcadi ursulae*?? >>> >>> Regards >>> Prashant >>> >>> -- >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> -- >> >> >> >> > > > > > -- > > > > --
