Oh yes Surajit ji ... I missed to understand that line. Regards. Dinesh
On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 6:31 PM, surajit koley < [email protected]> wrote: > Good evening Dinesh Ji, > > Certainly this is not *D. microphyllum*, i copy a line from my post, > "....... images and description of leaves available in the sites below > prevent me to ID this as *D. microphyllum* (Thunb.) DC. -.... ." > > Thank you & Regards, > > surajit > > > > > On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 6:03 PM, Dinesh Valke <[email protected]>wrote: > >> Surajit ji, ... am making an attempt to analyze ... may not be correct. >> >> 1. The leaves in picture at >> http://www.virboga.de/Desmodium_microphyllum.htm do not resemble to >> those in your plant; also cannot make out whether the leaves at virboga >> are >> trifoliate. >> 2. The plant's habit in http://89sky.net/vbb/showthread.php?p=41778does >> not look like that of your plant. Your plant seems more of a ground >> cover; the plant in referred link seems to have relatively, loosely spaced >> nodes. >> 3. and 4. The eflora links give descriptions of the leaves - was >> wanting to find whether there is any mention of the emarginate leaflets - >> clearly seen in your photos (the notches can be seen of those leaflets >> which are wholly facing) ... the leaflets in the pictures of first two >> links do not show emarginate leaflets; the 89sky.net picture has >> mucronate leaflets. >> >> Your plant does not seem to matching to any of those in the listed links. >> I would believe your plant to be *Desmodium triflorum. >> >> *Let us wait for comments.* >> >> *Regards. >> Dinesh* >> * >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 1:26 PM, surajit koley < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Sir, >>> >>> This plant is growing just in front of our main gate, on brick & mortar! >>> Well, years of accumulation of dust, mud, debris etc made this brick & >>> mortar another cradle of life! And a part of this space turned itself into >>> a garden, dominated by this tiny creeping herb. >>> >>> An >>> illustration<http://www.efloras.org/object_page.aspx?object_id=53890&flora_id=5>found >>> in FoP tells me that this might be >>> *Desmodium triflorum* (L.) DC., but the >>> description<http://www.efloras.org/florataxon.aspx?flora_id=5&taxon_id=200012113>tells >>> me that my flowers are much smaller. Searched the group posts, found >>> - https://groups.google.com/d/topic/indiantreepix/o0h7K6Tc2_k/discussion >>> . >>> >>> On the other hand, images and description of leaves available in the >>> sites below prevent me to ID this as *D. microphyllum* (Thunb.) DC. - >>> >>> 1. http://www.virboga.de/Desmodium_microphyllum.htm >>> 2. http://89sky.net/vbb/showthread.php?p=41778 >>> 3. >>> http://www.efloras.org/florataxon.aspx?flora_id=5&taxon_id=200012104 >>> 4. >>> http://www.efloras.org/florataxon.aspx?flora_id=2&taxon_id=200012104 >>> >>> So, this remains a riddle to me. Attaching larger recorded yesterday at >>> my place, Nalikul, Hooghly. >>> >>> Thank you & Regards, >>> >>> surajit >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> > --
