Indeed yes Surajit ji ! They are emarginate too. Regards. Dinesh On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 6:48 PM, surajit koley < [email protected]> wrote:
> Dinesh Ji, > > Attaching another image.... do you think the leaflets at top left have > some amount of mucronate or mucronulate element? > > Thank you, > > Regards, > surajit > > > On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 6:36 PM, Dinesh Valke <[email protected]>wrote: > >> Oh yes Surajit ji ... I missed to understand that line. >> Regards. >> Dinesh >> >> >> On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 6:31 PM, surajit koley < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Good evening Dinesh Ji, >>> >>> Certainly this is not *D. microphyllum*, i copy a line from my post, >>> "....... images and description of leaves available in the sites below >>> prevent me to ID this as *D. microphyllum* (Thunb.) DC. -.... ." >>> >>> Thank you & Regards, >>> >>> surajit >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 6:03 PM, Dinesh Valke <[email protected]>wrote: >>> >>>> Surajit ji, ... am making an attempt to analyze ... may not be correct. >>>> >>>> 1. The leaves in picture at >>>> http://www.virboga.de/Desmodium_microphyllum.htm do not resemble to >>>> those in your plant; also cannot make out whether the leaves at virboga >>>> are >>>> trifoliate. >>>> 2. The plant's habit in http://89sky.net/vbb/showthread.php?p=41778does >>>> not look like that of your plant. Your plant seems more of a ground >>>> cover; the plant in referred link seems to have relatively, loosely >>>> spaced >>>> nodes. >>>> 3. and 4. The eflora links give descriptions of the leaves - was >>>> wanting to find whether there is any mention of the emarginate leaflets >>>> - >>>> clearly seen in your photos (the notches can be seen of those leaflets >>>> which are wholly facing) ... the leaflets in the pictures of first two >>>> links do not show emarginate leaflets; the 89sky.net picture has >>>> mucronate leaflets. >>>> >>>> Your plant does not seem to matching to any of those in the listed >>>> links. >>>> I would believe your plant to be *Desmodium triflorum. >>>> >>>> *Let us wait for comments.* >>>> >>>> *Regards. >>>> Dinesh* >>>> * >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 1:26 PM, surajit koley < >>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Sir, >>>>> >>>>> This plant is growing just in front of our main gate, on brick & >>>>> mortar! >>>>> Well, years of accumulation of dust, mud, debris etc made this brick & >>>>> mortar another cradle of life! And a part of this space turned itself into >>>>> a garden, dominated by this tiny creeping herb. >>>>> >>>>> An >>>>> illustration<http://www.efloras.org/object_page.aspx?object_id=53890&flora_id=5>found >>>>> in FoP tells me that this might be >>>>> *Desmodium triflorum* (L.) DC., but the >>>>> description<http://www.efloras.org/florataxon.aspx?flora_id=5&taxon_id=200012113>tells >>>>> me that my flowers are much smaller. Searched the group posts, found >>>>> - >>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/topic/indiantreepix/o0h7K6Tc2_k/discussion >>>>> . >>>>> >>>>> On the other hand, images and description of leaves available in the >>>>> sites below prevent me to ID this as *D. microphyllum* (Thunb.) DC. - >>>>> >>>>> 1. http://www.virboga.de/Desmodium_microphyllum.htm >>>>> 2. http://89sky.net/vbb/showthread.php?p=41778 >>>>> 3. >>>>> http://www.efloras.org/florataxon.aspx?flora_id=5&taxon_id=200012104 >>>>> 4. >>>>> http://www.efloras.org/florataxon.aspx?flora_id=2&taxon_id=200012104 >>>>> >>>>> So, this remains a riddle to me. Attaching larger recorded yesterday >>>>> at my place, Nalikul, Hooghly. >>>>> >>>>> Thank you & Regards, >>>>> >>>>> surajit >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >> > --
