Thank you Dinesh Ji, will try to find its pod and explore further, thought it would be easy to ID with the help of this couple of images!
Regards, surajit On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 6:55 PM, Dinesh Valke <[email protected]>wrote: > Indeed yes Surajit ji ! > They are emarginate too. > Regards. > Dinesh > > On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 6:48 PM, surajit koley < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> Dinesh Ji, >> >> Attaching another image.... do you think the leaflets at top left have >> some amount of mucronate or mucronulate element? >> >> Thank you, >> >> Regards, >> surajit >> >> >> On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 6:36 PM, Dinesh Valke <[email protected]>wrote: >> >>> Oh yes Surajit ji ... I missed to understand that line. >>> Regards. >>> Dinesh >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 6:31 PM, surajit koley < >>> [email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> Good evening Dinesh Ji, >>>> >>>> Certainly this is not *D. microphyllum*, i copy a line from my post, >>>> "....... images and description of leaves available in the sites >>>> below prevent me to ID this as *D. microphyllum* (Thunb.) DC. -.... ." >>>> >>>> Thank you & Regards, >>>> >>>> surajit >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 6:03 PM, Dinesh Valke >>>> <[email protected]>wrote: >>>> >>>>> Surajit ji, ... am making an attempt to analyze ... may not be correct. >>>>> >>>>> 1. The leaves in picture at >>>>> http://www.virboga.de/Desmodium_microphyllum.htm do not resemble >>>>> to those in your plant; also cannot make out whether the leaves at >>>>> virboga >>>>> are trifoliate. >>>>> 2. The plant's habit in >>>>> http://89sky.net/vbb/showthread.php?p=41778does not look like that of >>>>> your plant. Your plant seems more of a ground >>>>> cover; the plant in referred link seems to have relatively, loosely >>>>> spaced >>>>> nodes. >>>>> 3. and 4. The eflora links give descriptions of the leaves - was >>>>> wanting to find whether there is any mention of the emarginate >>>>> leaflets - >>>>> clearly seen in your photos (the notches can be seen of those leaflets >>>>> which are wholly facing) ... the leaflets in the pictures of first two >>>>> links do not show emarginate leaflets; the 89sky.net picture has >>>>> mucronate leaflets. >>>>> >>>>> Your plant does not seem to matching to any of those in the listed >>>>> links. >>>>> I would believe your plant to be *Desmodium triflorum. >>>>> >>>>> *Let us wait for comments.* >>>>> >>>>> *Regards. >>>>> Dinesh* >>>>> * >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 1:26 PM, surajit koley < >>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Sir, >>>>>> >>>>>> This plant is growing just in front of our main gate, on brick & >>>>>> mortar! >>>>>> Well, years of accumulation of dust, mud, debris etc made this brick >>>>>> & mortar another cradle of life! And a part of this space turned itself >>>>>> into a garden, dominated by this tiny creeping herb. >>>>>> >>>>>> An >>>>>> illustration<http://www.efloras.org/object_page.aspx?object_id=53890&flora_id=5>found >>>>>> in FoP tells me that this might be >>>>>> *Desmodium triflorum* (L.) DC., but the >>>>>> description<http://www.efloras.org/florataxon.aspx?flora_id=5&taxon_id=200012113>tells >>>>>> me that my flowers are much smaller. Searched the group posts, found >>>>>> - >>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/topic/indiantreepix/o0h7K6Tc2_k/discussion >>>>>> . >>>>>> >>>>>> On the other hand, images and description of leaves available in the >>>>>> sites below prevent me to ID this as *D. microphyllum* (Thunb.) DC. - >>>>>> >>>>>> 1. http://www.virboga.de/Desmodium_microphyllum.htm >>>>>> 2. http://89sky.net/vbb/showthread.php?p=41778 >>>>>> 3. >>>>>> http://www.efloras.org/florataxon.aspx?flora_id=5&taxon_id=200012104 >>>>>> 4. >>>>>> http://www.efloras.org/florataxon.aspx?flora_id=2&taxon_id=200012104 >>>>>> >>>>>> So, this remains a riddle to me. Attaching larger recorded yesterday >>>>>> at my place, Nalikul, Hooghly. >>>>>> >>>>>> Thank you & Regards, >>>>>> >>>>>> surajit >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> > --
