Good morning Dr. Pankaj Sir Thanks very much for the info, i didn't know, followed the efl below :-
1. http://www.efloras.org/florataxon.aspx?flora_id=11&taxon_id=200006990 2. http://www.efloras.org/florataxon.aspx?flora_id=610&taxon_id=200006990 3. http://www.efloras.org/florataxon.aspx?flora_id=3&taxon_id=200006990 4. http://www.efloras.org/florataxon.aspx?flora_id=5&taxon_id=200006990 I am happy there are many uneducated fools like me. Regards, surajit On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 4:44 AM, Dr Pankaj Kumar <[email protected]>wrote: > Dear Mr. Surajit > I am fascinated by the details provided by you through images for each > plant. > Just wanted to give one small technical suggestion. > Carl Linne or Carolus Linnaeus can be written as Linnaeus or L. but not > Linn. > It is in accordance with ICBN Article 46A.4/Note.1.; as well as following > reference: > R. K. Brummitt & C. E. Powell, ed. (1992). Authors of Plant Names: a List > of Authors of Scientific Names of Plants, with Recommended Standard Forms > of their Names, Including Abbreviations. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew. > Regards > Pankaj > > > > On Tuesday, 18 December 2012 01:23:31 UTC+8, surajitkoley wrote: >> >> Sir, >> >> I think it is *Amarantus gangeticus* Linn. = *Amaranthus gangeticus* Linn. = >> *A. tricolor* Linn., according to >> GRIN<http://www.ars-grin.gov/cgi-bin/npgs/html/taxon.pl?2793>and The >> Plant List <http://www.theplantlist.org/tpl/record/kew-2633132>. >> >> Thank you & Regards, >> >> surajit >> >> -- > > > > --
