Kawan2 Anggota Milis Yth,

International Telecomunaction Union (ITU) akhirnya menyerah bahwa walaupun 
pihaknya tetap pada pendiriannya tentang Definisi 4G rigid yang menurutnya 
hanya berlaku bagi WiMAX 16m dan LTE Advanced, namun secara realistis istilah 
4G dapat dipakai bagi teknologi awal WiMAx dan LTE, yaitu WiMAX 16e dan LTE 
biasa.

Ini sebuah pengakuan yang jujur, sebab kedua teknologi awal 4G itu (WiMAX 16e 
dan LTE) memang merupakan loncatan teknologi baru yang berbeda dari teknologi 
3G yang di-disain utamanya untuk layana Voice, SMS dan Fax, sedangkan untuk 
layanan Data, merupakan teknolgi tambahan atau "add-on" saja.

Berikut ini adalah pengakuan jujur dari ITU itu sbb:

ITU capitulates, admits that the term '4G' could apply to LTE, WiMAX, and 
'evolved 3G technologies'                                                       
                              By Chris Ziegler  posted Dec 18th 2010 5:35PM     
                                                                                
                                                                                
                                                                                
                                                                                
                                                                                
                                                                                
                                                                      Though 
it's standing firm on the definition of its original 4G specification -- 
IMT-Advanced -- which only WiMAX 2 and LTE-Advanced are currently capable of 
meeting, the ITU is easing off its earlier rhetroic,  admitting that the term 
"4G" realistically could apply "to the  forerunners of these technologies, LTE 
and WiMAX, and to other evolved  3G technologies providing a substantial level 
of improvement in  performance and capabilities with respect to the initial 
third  generation systems now deployed." The whole dust-up started when  
carriers around the world deploying LTE and WiMAX networks (ahem,  Sprint and 
Verizon) were throwing the "4G" term around very, very  loosely -- and to their 
credit, the networks are indisputably a  generation beyond CDMA2000 and UMTS / 
HSPA, so if anything, we'd fault  the ITU for leaving today's modern networks 
without a generation to call  their own. The "evolved 3G technologies" verbiage 
in the ITU's  statement would seemingly even leave room for T-Mobile USA's 
claim  that its 21Mbps HSPA+ network constitutes 4G... so yeah, score one for  
marketing campaigns. Of course, none of these carriers had ever planned  to bow 
to the ITU's recommendations anyway, so the ruling has little  practical 
relevance -- just know that the true 4G speeds are still a few years off.

Silahkan ditanggapi demi kemajuan bangsa dan negara.

Wassalam,
S Roestam
http://wirelesstekno.blogspot.com
http://dagang.com - tempat anda cari bisnis di Indonesia
http://kampus-maya.com - tempat anda cari kampus online

Kirim email ke