We should prefer `struct pci_device_id` over `DEFINE_PCI_DEVICE_TABLE` to meet
kernel coding style guidelines. This issue was reported by checkpatch.
Signed-off-by: Benoit Taine <benoit.ta...@lip6.fr>
---
Tested by compilation without errors.
drivers/ipack/carriers/tpci200.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/ipack/carriers/tpci200.c b/drivers/ipack/carriers/tpci200.c
index c276fde..de5e321 100644
--- a/drivers/ipack/carriers/tpci200.c
+++ b/drivers/ipack/carriers/tpci200.c
@@ -618,7 +618,7 @@ static void tpci200_pci_remove(struct pci_dev *dev)
__tpci200_pci_remove(tpci200);
}
-static DEFINE_PCI_DEVICE_TABLE(tpci200_idtable) = {
+static const struct pci_device_id tpci200_idtable[] = {
{ TPCI200_VENDOR_ID, TPCI200_DEVICE_ID, TPCI200_SUBVENDOR_ID,
TPCI200_SUBDEVICE_ID },
{ 0, },
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Want fast and easy access to all the code in your enterprise? Index and
search up to 200,000 lines of code with a free copy of Black Duck
Code Sight - the same software that powers the world's largest code
search on Ohloh, the Black Duck Open Hub! Try it now.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/bds
_______________________________________________
Industrypack-devel mailing list
Industrypack-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/industrypack-devel
