On 2 Feb 2011, at 13:51, Vladimir Blagojevic wrote: > On 11-02-02 10:41 AM, Mircea Markus wrote: >>> +1 I believe this can coexist/complement current setters approach. I do >>> not see how this can affect JAXB. It should work. >> you mean setXyzClass? >> I agree that this can coexist but I think the point is to simplify >> configuration so I'd rather take these methods out (5 doesn't need to be >> backward compatible). > You would only leave this new API and remove the old setters? I guess we > can do that as well, did not even cross my mind, but maybe, why not?
Hmm, leave the old setters IMO, and deprecate them. Lets allow existing stuff to work! ;) -- Manik Surtani [email protected] twitter.com/maniksurtani Lead, Infinispan http://www.infinispan.org _______________________________________________ infinispan-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev
