BTW why not <transaction timeout=""/> what is the reasoning behind cacheStop?
On 4 févr. 2011, at 11:53, Manik Surtani wrote: > Yeah that works. > > On 3 Feb 2011, at 19:29, Galder Zamarreño wrote: > >> In this end I went for <transaction cacheStopTimeout="30000"/> - in case you >> wanna make any comments :) >> >> https://github.com/infinispan/infinispan/pull/154 >> >> On Feb 3, 2011, at 5:26 PM, Galder Zamarreño wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I've got a solution for https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-915 which >>> involves TransactionTable waiting for some time before giving up waiting on >>> on-going txs. >>> >>> Clearly, this wait time should be configurable and I was suggesting >>> something like: >>> >>> <transaction stopTimeout="30000"/> >>> >>> What should be the default value for it? 30s Ok? >>> >>> WDYT? >>> -- >>> Galder Zamarreño >>> Sr. Software Engineer >>> Infinispan, JBoss Cache >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> infinispan-dev mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev >> >> -- >> Galder Zamarreño >> Sr. Software Engineer >> Infinispan, JBoss Cache >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> infinispan-dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev > > -- > Manik Surtani > [email protected] > twitter.com/maniksurtani > > Lead, Infinispan > http://www.infinispan.org > > > > > _______________________________________________ > infinispan-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev _______________________________________________ infinispan-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev
