On 4 May 2011, at 23:47, Tristan Tarrant wrote: > On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 23:51, Manik Surtani <ma...@jboss.org> wrote: > > So I reckon Javascript is the way to go, at least from a protocol standpoint. > Now how we expose this in remote client APIs (Java, Python, etc) needs some > thought, but at first glance it would seem as though we won't have a direct > mapping to what we do on the embedded side of things. E.g., > http://www.mongodb.org/display/DOCS/MapReduce > > Actually, using javax.script, we could default to Javascript (which is > included in every Java6 implementation out there) but also be able to specify > alternatives via a mimetype. In this way one could use any of the JSR 223 > languages (Jython, JRuby, Groovy, etc).
This is a pretty good idea I think. _______________________________________________ infinispan-dev mailing list infinispan-dev@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev
