On 9 Jun 2011, at 20:39, Manik Surtani wrote: > Regarding the comment on transactional versus non-transactional threads > mentioned on https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-1137 - I think the fact > that we allow this is a flaw. > > The approach we are taking with JSR 107 is such: > > 1) If a cache is non-transactional, transactional threads accessing the cache > throw an exception. > 2) If a cache is transactional, threads must have an ongoing transaction. If > not, an exception is thrown, unless: > 3) Auto-commit is configured to be true. In this case, if a > non-transactional thread accesses the cache, a tx is started, work done, and > the tx auto-committed. +1. This requires an auto-commit option on the cache.
_______________________________________________ infinispan-dev mailing list infinispan-dev@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev
