On 4 Jul 2011, at 07:57, Galder Zamarreño wrote: > I get the feeling that those atomic operations are particularly useful when > transactions are not used cos they allow you to reduce to cache operations to > one, hence avoiding the need to use a lock or synchronized block, or in our > case, a transaction.
Precisely. I think the atomic ops should be documented such that they are not used within a transaction scope, possibly either: 1) suspending any ongoing tx if used, or 2) throwing an illegal state exception if used within a tx scope -- Manik Surtani ma...@jboss.org twitter.com/maniksurtani Lead, Infinispan http://www.infinispan.org _______________________________________________ infinispan-dev mailing list infinispan-dev@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev
