On Oct 4, 2011, at 11:58 PM, Mircea Markus wrote: > > On 3 Oct 2011, at 01:09, Manik Surtani wrote: > >> >> On 28 Sep 2011, at 10:56, Dan Berindei wrote: >> >>> I'm not sure if the comment is valid though, since the old >>> StateTransferManager had priority 55 and it also cleared the data >>> container before applying the state from the coordinator. I'm not sure >>> how preloading and state transfer are supposed to interact, maybe >>> Manik can help clear this up? >> >> Hmm - this is interesting. I think preloading should happen first, since >> the cache store may contain old data. > I can't find Dan's original email - was it set to the entire list?
Yes it was. Dan renamed the subject thread: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/infinispan-dev/2011-September/009128.html > > I don't get the entire context, but I don't think preloading *first* would > resolve the consistency problem in the case of deletions: what if you preload > something that was in between deleted from memory? > _______________________________________________ > infinispan-dev mailing list > infinispan-dev@lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev -- Galder Zamarreño Sr. Software Engineer Infinispan, JBoss Cache _______________________________________________ infinispan-dev mailing list infinispan-dev@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev