On 20 Dec 2011, at 18:07, Paolo Romano wrote: > On 12/18/11 9:45 PM, Manik Surtani wrote: >> >> >> On 10 Dec 2011, at 11:46, Sebastiano Peluso wrote: >> >>> >>> - About JTA semantics, what do you mean by the term "full"? During the >>> integration of GMU, we have not changed the way a transaction was already >>> managed in Infinispan (e.g. 2-PC, interaction between Transaction Manager >>> and XAResource), so I think that the answer is yes. But since I have not a >>> deep knowledge about JTA specification, maybe there is some aspect that I >>> have not considered. >> >> In that case, then yes, GMU will be JTA compliant. Good. :) >> >> What are your next steps with GMU? > > Doing some additional scalability test (I want to see it running with 100 > nodes or more!!), but first we need to finalize work on a deliverable due the > first days of January. > > Of course, we would be glad to contribute it to Infinispan! In order to ease > integration, my plan is to rebase it on 5.1 as soon as we finish the work on > the replication/distribution protocols using total-order multicast/broadcast. > > With some luck, this work should all be ended on time for the next Cloud-TM > meeting in London (Jan 10).
Great, looking forward to it! :) -- Manik Surtani ma...@jboss.org twitter.com/maniksurtani Lead, Infinispan http://www.infinispan.org
_______________________________________________ infinispan-dev mailing list infinispan-dev@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev
