Apologies for being so late on this thread. On 1 Feb 2012, at 18:12, Sanne Grinovero wrote:
> On 1 February 2012 16:40, Bela Ban <b...@redhat.com> wrote: >> Your benchmark is giving me the creeps ! > > Manik was the original author, I've only been adapting it slightly to > identify performance issues. I wouldn't have used Maven either, but > it's serving me well especially since it turns out I have to > frequently change JGroups version ;-) Yup, this is why I used Maven here. To be able to easily swap Infinispan and JGroups versions just by commenting/uncommenting a few lines of XML rather than juggling jar files. >> I don't think I'll ever switch to this f*cking piece of shit ! > > I don't think Maven is to be blamed today! What's wrong? > > Anyway one of the nice things of this little benchmark is exactly that > it it's a single class with a main file, so you can just import it in > you IDE and run. Any IDE will pick the correct dependencies, thanks to > Maven. Just that if you do, it will use the default test properties as > hardcoded in the test class org.infinispan.benchmark.Transactional: > please set the same environment variable as bench.sh does, unless you > don't want to run my same configuration. Yup, again the test is designed to be run via Maven or in your IDE - as Sanne pointed out, the IDE picks up dependencies from the Maven pom. Further, I also run it using JProfiler's IntelliJ plugin when I want to profile it. -- Manik Surtani ma...@jboss.org twitter.com/maniksurtani Lead, Infinispan http://www.infinispan.org _______________________________________________ infinispan-dev mailing list infinispan-dev@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev
