On 7 Feb 2012, at 16:20, Manik Surtani wrote: > Yes, agreed. Pete, any thoughts on why these changed?
This was discussed back at the time. We moved them precisely so that problem code would show up. > > On 7 Feb 2012, at 07:47, Galder Zamarreño wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Re: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-1842 This is *not* caused by the move, it's actually shown up another problem. >> Re: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-1844 Yeah, this is caused by it though >> >> Both of these problems are rooted in the fact that both the path and the >> schema name changed in 5.1. >> >> IMO, both the path and schema should revert back to the old values. I don't >> see why these should change and it would make everyone's life easier. I'm not bothered either way. Just make sure we update any related tests. >> >> WDYT? >> >> Cheers, >> -- >> Galder Zamarreño >> Sr. Software Engineer >> Infinispan, JBoss Cache >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> infinispan-dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev > > -- > Manik Surtani > [email protected] > twitter.com/maniksurtani > > Lead, Infinispan > http://www.infinispan.org > > > > > _______________________________________________ > infinispan-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev _______________________________________________ infinispan-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev
