Sorry dude, I'm a bit loaded these days (I know I'm preaching to the choir :) +1 for separating GC and CPU diagram. I plan to update the code and run the benchmark on your last release at some point this week, but that's a bit of a low prio atm. Cheers, Mircea
----- Original Message ----- > From: "Galder Zamarreño" <[email protected]> > To: "infinispan -Dev List" <[email protected]> > Cc: "Mircea Markus" <[email protected]> > Sent: Tuesday, February 28, 2012 9:09:21 AM > Subject: Re: [infinispan-dev] CPU and GC diagrams > > Mircea? > > On Feb 22, 2012, at 4:59 PM, Galder Zamarreño wrote: > > > Hey, > > > > First of all, thx for incorporating my memory and CPU usage metrics > > :) > > > > I have a question though. In http://goo.gl/n65ib diagram, wouldn't > > it be more useful if you had two lines per test? One for CPU usage > > and one for GC usage? That way, you could figure out which part of > > that CPU usage is GC and hence you might be able to map this with > > a reduction in thoughtput. > > > > In fact, what might be better is if you add GC usage (only!) to > > throughput diagram and then you can see immediately see if a drop > > in throughput is due to GC or not. > > > > WDYT? > > -- > > Galder Zamarreño > > Sr. Software Engineer > > Infinispan, JBoss Cache > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > infinispan-dev mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev > > -- > Galder Zamarreño > Sr. Software Engineer > Infinispan, JBoss Cache > > _______________________________________________ infinispan-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev
