On 11 Apr 2012, at 12:54, Manik Surtani wrote: > > On 11 Apr 2012, at 12:37, Mircea Markus wrote: > >> Not true. The recovery support we have implemented is there to solve just >> that and become consistent. There's no "just as consistent" but only >> "consistent" or "not consistent" :-) > > Recovery assumes manual intervention though? yes. > If so again you should document that cache stores only risk being > inconsistent if you are using recovery. Otherwise, the risk of inconsistency > is the same risk you have with a non-recovery-enabled in-memory container. So basically the risk of inconsistency when using cache loaders is there disregarding you using recovery or not. I'll add a statement to further clarify that recovery won't be able to reconcile the state. > > Basically, you're trying to say Cache Stores don't support recovery. ;) nor atomicity, as data can be partially applied to the store during commit.
_______________________________________________ infinispan-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev
