On 24 Apr 2012, at 01:53, Manik Surtani wrote: > Mircea, > > When you wrote the Hot Rod client, you abstracted the transport away so we > could have alternate network implementations, right? Yes, that was the idea behind it. > The reason I ask is that at some point we should look at not only an NIO impl > (I know you had one that you experimented with some while back) but also a > JDK7 NIO2 one, and benchmark the three.
Agreed. I'd expect an NIO/NIO2 client to handle much better the async requests from client to the server than the current IO client which is optimised for sync operations. _______________________________________________ infinispan-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev
