On 15 May 2012, at 17:21, Manik Surtani wrote: > > On 15 May 2012, at 17:10, Galder Zamarreño wrote: > >> You have not yet given me a single reason why we should put back something >> that's flawed. All you've said is: i rely on X and I want it back. > > Well, the old scheme was broken and there are several good reasons why we > moved to a more consistent approach. > > Diego, can't your work be modified to work with the new schemes?
+1
_______________________________________________ infinispan-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev
