On 1 Jun 2012, at 16:21, Vladimir Blagojevic wrote:

> On 12-06-01 4:49 AM, Manik Surtani wrote:
>> 
>> We should update the interface then to indicate how you intend to make the 
>> ExecutorService made available to implementations.  :)
> 
> We can provide setDistributedExecutorService(DistributedExecutorService 
> service) method on DistributedTaskFailoverPolicy interface? However, users 
> can rather easily construct their own impl of DistributedTaskFailoverPolicy 
> by passing instance of readily available DistributedExecutorService through a 
> DistributedTaskFailoverPolicy constructor for example. The downside is that 
> only programmatic configuration would work in this case. If we have set 
> method contract then we can setup custom task failover through xml 
> configuration. WDYT?

+1 to having a policy that can be configured via XML.

>>>> * Do you plan to include any canned failover policies?  If so, what are 
>>>> these?
>>> Yes, at least random and never failover policy.
>>>> * Shouldn't  DistributedTaskFailoverPolicy be parameterised to return the 
>>>> same type as DistributedFuture.get() rather than an untyped Object?
>>> I would love to make it but how can we do it? DefaultExecutorService is not 
>>> typed and method of DistributedTaskFailoverPolicy is not either.
>> Can DTFP not be typed?  And even our sub-interface of ExecutorService?
>> 
> I am not sure if we should type our sub interface of ExecutorService. 
> Although I do not know how to argue against it, all sub interfaces and impls 
> I have seen use generic methods. Probably because generic methods give you 
> more flexibility. So yes DTFP can by typed albeit not a very useful thing as 
> DTFP should deal with generic type T rather than particular type. I think 
> there is no need to type the interface when we can type method in DTFP. Also 
> up until today I thought that generic method can infer its parameter type 
> from its argument type only. However, even this works:
> 
> <T> T foo(){...}
> 
> Pretty cool! 

Do you have an example of what you are proposing by inferring its type?

--
Manik Surtani
[email protected]
twitter.com/maniksurtani

Lead, Infinispan
http://www.infinispan.org



_______________________________________________
infinispan-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev

Reply via email to