Reading, https://docs.jboss.org/author/display/ISPN/Cross+site+replication,
I've spotted the following:
if CUSTOM failurePolicyClass requires a failurePolicyClass, it would have been
wiser to do this type of configuration:
<backup>
<customBackupFailurePolicy failurePolicyClass="x" />
</backup>
--
<backup>
<warnBackupFailurePolicy />
</backup>
…etc
Having failurePolicyClass as a property of backup that's optional but required
when backupFailurePolicy="CUSTOM" is clunky IMO.
WDYT?
Cheers,
--
Galder Zamarreño
[email protected]
twitter.com/galderz
Project Lead, Escalante
http://escalante.io
Engineer, Infinispan
http://infinispan.org
_______________________________________________
infinispan-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev
