On 26 Sep 2012, at 15:04, Sanne Grinovero <[email protected]> wrote:
> Ales, > +1 for removing it all: your vote is valuable as our most interesting user. > > @Manik, I think rewriting CacheQuery is a much bigger change as I'd > expect most people to use the simpler > org.infinispan.query.CacheQuery.list() output. Ok, fair enough. > > Also if we deprecate the old methods, we'll need to implement them > correctly for clustered queries as well which is a massive amount of > work, not worth it since we agreed the API is useless in its current > form. > > @Luksa you seem to have a solid understanding of what need to be > done.. do whatever you need to make this API make sense. > Iterable<Object> looks like the contract to go. +1. > > @Emmanuel great point, I was about screwing projections up again :-) > > Cheers, > Sanne > > On 26 September 2012 14:49, Ales Justin <[email protected]> wrote: >> Can we please get a decision on this, >> so we try to get something *workable* into next 5.2. release? >> >> -Ales >> >> p.s. since it looks like nobody is using this, apart from CapeDwarf, >> my vote goes into replacing/removing the methods >> >> _______________________________________________ >> infinispan-dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev > _______________________________________________ > infinispan-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev -- Manik Surtani [email protected] twitter.com/maniksurtani Platform Architect, JBoss Data Grid http://red.ht/data-grid
_______________________________________________ infinispan-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev
