On Dec 4, 2012, at 12:17 PM, Mircea Markus <[email protected]> wrote:

> If ti's only for that logic I'd rather have it implemented in Infinispan for 
> now, as it doesn't seem that complex.

^ +10000000000000000000000000000000

In particular, commons libraries can be pretty evil.

> Project dependencies has started to become more and more of an issue (e.g. in 
> 6.0. we want to allow the users to only download a single jar if they need 
> local cache only) so I'd rather not add new dependencies unless absolutely 
> necessary. 
> 
> On 3 Dec 2012, at 18:24, Vladimir Blagojevic wrote:
>> Hi,
>> 
>> I see that we already use some commons-xyz libs and I was wondering if 
>> we can introduce commons-lang lib dependency in our code? I found their 
>> implementation of ExceptionUtils pretty solid and I would like to use 
>> [1]. There are other useful classes as well and the jar should not be 
>> too big!
>> 
>> Regards,
>> Vladimir
>> 
>> 
>> [1] 
>> http://commons.apache.org/lang/api-release/org/apache/commons/lang3/exception/ExceptionUtils.html#getRootCause(java.lang.Throwable)
>> _______________________________________________
>> infinispan-dev mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev
> 
> Cheers,
> -- 
> Mircea Markus
> Infinispan lead (www.infinispan.org)
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> infinispan-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev


--
Galder Zamarreño
[email protected]
twitter.com/galderz

Project Lead, Escalante
http://escalante.io

Engineer, Infinispan
http://infinispan.org


_______________________________________________
infinispan-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev

Reply via email to