On Feb 6, 2013, at 9:37 AM, Galder Zamarreño <[email protected]> wrote:

> 
> On Jan 31, 2013, at 1:42 PM, Mircea Markus <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> 
>> On 31 Jan 2013, at 12:37, Manik Surtani wrote:
>> 
>>>> I don't think that encouraging scala code is good purely for maintenance 
>>>> reasons. If there's a choice, it should be java. Not saying that learning 
>>>> a new language is not cool - but in practice people are a bit put off by 
>>>> maintaining Scala code. Its not only about what the writer of the code 
>>>> prefers as a language: it's more important what the maintainers of the 
>>>> code 
>>>> will has to work with.
>>> 
>>> Would such maintainers also be put off by new language features (lambdas) 
>>> in Java 8 when we (eventually) baseline to it?  :-)
>> It's really NOT the same thing: any decent java programmer keeps up with all 
>> the enhancements in Java. 
>> What I might not want to - as an ISPN programmer - is to keep up with the 
>> language enhancements in Scala. And I might need to do that because of Scala 
>> language enhancements used in ISPN.
> 
> ^ I wonder whether C programmers thought the same way 20 years ago.

20 years ago? I'm pretty sure Bela said this last week.

Besides, it's all JavaScript these days. Scala is old and busted ;)


-alan



_______________________________________________
infinispan-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev

Reply via email to